Explanatory Memorandum – June 2020

Treasury revises down estimated JobKeeper cost by $60 billion

The ATO and Treasury have released a joint statement advising that the previous estimate of the number of employers who would access the JobKeeper program was significantly overstated. Treasury now estimates the number of employees likely to be covered under the JobKeeper program to be around 3.5 million (down from a previous estimate of 6.5 million employees). As a result, Treasury has revised down the estimated cost of JobKeeper to around $70 billion (down from the original $130 billion estimate).

The overstatement has been attributed to errors that employers made when applying for the JobKeeper payment. For example, when estimating their eligibility over 500 businesses with only a single eligible employee actually reported the dollar amount that they expected to receive per fortnightly JobKeeper payment (ie 1,500) instead of the number of their eligible employees (ie 1). This reporting error has come to light as the ATO and Treasury have been analysing the amounts being paid out under the scheme, and reconciling them with the estimates provided by enrolled businesses of the likely number of eligible employees. It was not picked up by the ATO earlier as its primary focus in the first fortnight was on ensuring that JobKeeper payments were paid promptly to those eligible for them, and were not paid to those who were ineligible.

Importantly, this reporting error has no consequences for JobKeeper payments that have already been made to eligible businesses, as payments under the scheme depend on the subsequent declaration that an eligible business makes in relation to each and every eligible employee. This declaration does not involve estimates and requires an employer to provide the Tax File Number (TFN) for each eligible employee.

As of 20 May 2020, 910,055 businesses had enrolled in the JobKeeper program. Of these, 759,654 had made claims in relation to their eligible employees and had their applications processed. This resulted in $8.7 billion of approved payments to those 759,654 businesses, covering around 2.9 million employees. Around 97% of claims have been paid to employers within three business days of employers making the employee declaration.

From the economic viewpoint, Treasury expects the unemployment rate would have been around 5% higher in the absence of the JobKeeper program than it currently is. Treasury continues to expect the unemployment rate to reach around 10%, although as indicated by the recent Labour Force survey, the measured level of the unemployment is highly uncertain given the impact of physical distancing restrictions on the participation rate.

Registration and declaration deadlines

The ATO has reminded all eligible employers that 31 May 2020 is the final date employers can enrol for JobKeeper if they intend to claim for wages paid for JobKeeper fortnights in April and May.

Further, all eligible employers who have enrolled but not yet made their employee declaration must ensure that they complete their April declaration by 31 May 2020. The ATO also reminds employers that on an on-going basis they must declare their eligible employees monthly. May declarations must be made by 14 June 2020.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Media-centre/Media-releases/Joint-Treasury-and-ATO-statement—JobKeeper-update/.

Snapshot of Federal COVID-19 pandemic measures

The following is a snapshot of Australia’s all-of-Government financial measures in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. It does not deal with the response measures specific to the various states and territories.

Tax-related business measures
  • Cash flow boost payments: Tax-free payments of up to $100,000 are available for eligible small and medium sized entities (SMEs) and not-for-profits (including charities) that employ people, with a minimum payment of $20,000. The amounts will be delivered will be made in two stages. At 23 April 2020, the ATO had paid out $3 billion in cash flow boost payments to 177,000 businesses ahead of the originally anticipated start date of 28 April. Further cash flow boost payments will be made by October 2020.
  • Instant asset write-off extended and increased to $150,000: The Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Act 2020 has amended the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to increase the instant asset write-off threshold from $30,000 to $150,000 for business entities with aggregated annual turnover of less than $50 million (up from a minimum of $50 million) from 12 March 2020 to 30 June 2020.
  • Accelerated rates of depreciation: Businesses with aggregated turnover of less than $500 million in an income year can deduct capital allowances for depreciating assets at an accelerated rate. This measure extends over two income years; that is, 2019–2020 (albeit not the full year) and all of 2020–2021.
  • Research and development (R&D) tax incentive applications for 2019 extended: The Government has deferred the lodgment dates for R&D tax incentive applications for the 2018–2019 income year until 30 September 2020.
JobKeeper Payment
  • JobKeeper legislation passed: This contains the legislative framework to implement the Government’s JobKeeper Payment program (with the mechanics to be contained in Statutory Rules). At 23 April 2020, more than 900,000 businesses had registered their interest in accessing JobKeeper payments, with 275,000 already completing applications.
  • JobKeeper Statutory Rules (as amended): These contain the detailed rules and taxpayer requirements to qualify for the JobKeeper Payment program.
  • JobKeeper “decline in turnover” tests: Details are now available regarding the alternative tests that can be used to determine if the “decline in turnover” requirement of the JobKeeper Payment program is satisfied. New rules set out a separate decline in turnover test where businesses use a special purpose entity to employ staff, and there have been changes to rules affecting charities, religious practitioners, the selection of all eligible employees (one-in, all-in), students aged 16 and 17, international aid organisations and universities.
  • Banks can confirm employer JobKeeper elections: Authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) are able to confirm that the ATO has provided a notice to an employer concerning their election to participate in the JobKeeper Payment program. This measure is designed to assist in the provision of bridging finance.
  • JobKeeper deadline(s) extension: Employers had until 8 May 2020 to pay staff for the first two JobKeeper fortnights and must be registered by 31 May 2020 (the deadline was previously 30 April for both).
  • Fair Work advice: The Fair Work Commission has released a “JobKeeper disputes benchbook” to assist employers and employees to resolve disputes relating to the JobKeeper Payment scheme.
Superannuation
  • Superannuation early release up to $20,000: Individuals affected by COVID-19 can apply via myGov to release (tax-free) up to $10,000 of their superannuation in the 2019–2020 financial year. A second application up to $10,000 can be made in the 2020–2021 year until 24 September 2020. To be eligible, a person must be unemployed or eligible to receive income support such as JobSeeker or Youth Allowance payments. Alternatively, on or after 1 January 2020, the person must have been made redundant or have had their working hours reduced by 20% or more (or, for a sole trader, have experienced a reduction in turnover of 20% or more).
  • Super pension drawdowns reduced by 50%: The minimum annual payment amounts for pensions and annuities have been temporarily reduced by 50% for 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. The reduction in the minimum payment amounts applies to account-based, allocated and market-linked (term allocated) pensions.
  • Temporary residents early release for COVID-19: Certain temporary residents impacted by COVID-19 may apply for an early release of up to $10,000 of their superannuation by 30 June 2020.
  • Tax agents granted Australian financial services (AFS) licensing relief for early release: A temporary AFS licensing exemption allows registered tax agents to provide certain financial product advice to their existing clients about the early release of superannuation under the coronavirus condition of release. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has also provided some administrative relief.
  • Anti-money-laundering/counter-terrorism-financing (AML/CTF) exemption for early super release: The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) has registered legislative rules to provide a temporary exemption from the customer identification procedures for super funds making COVID-19-related early super release payments in respect of the anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism rules.
Social security
  • Fortnightly $550 Coronavirus Supplement: This supplement is available for job seekers, sole traders, students and some others. It effectively doubles the current payment for new and existing social security recipients from 27 April 2020. It will be paid for six months to both existing and new recipients of the JobSeeker Payment, Sickness Allowance, Youth Allowance for jobseekers, Parenting Payment Partnered, Parenting Payment Single, Partner Allowance, Sickness Allowance and the Farm Household Allowance.
  • $750 stimulus payments for income support recipients: The first $750 cash stimulus payment has now gone out to 6.8 million eligible pensioners, carers, disability support pensioners, those on family tax benefits and concession card holders. A second $750 payment will be made from 13 July 2020 for eligible income recipients and concession card holders.
  • Pension deeming rates cut: The social security deeming rate have been reduced (twice) to 0.25% for financial investments up to $51,800 for single pensioners and $86,200 for pensioner couples. The upper deeming rate is 2.25% for balances over these amounts.
Regulation
  • Commercial property tenancies: The Prime Minister has confirmed that the states and territories will legislate the Mandatory Code of Conduct for SME commercial leasing principles during COVID-19.
  • Creditor’s statutory demand threshold: The current minimum threshold for creditors issuing a statutory demand on a company under the Corporations Act 2001 has been raised from $2,000 to $20,000. The statutory timeframe for a company to respond to a statutory demand has been extended from 21 days to six months.
  • Bankruptcy minimum debt of $20,000: The threshold for the minimum amount of debt required for a creditor to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against a debtor (ie personal insolvency) will increase from its current level of $5,000 to $20,000. The time debtors have to respond to a bankruptcy notice will be increased from 21 days to six months.
  • Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Directors will be temporarily relieved of their duty to prevent insolvent trading with respect to any debts incurred in the ordinary course of the company’s business.
  • Federal wage subsidy for apprentices: Eligible employers can apply for a wage subsidy of 50% of an apprentice’s or a trainee’s wage paid during the nine months from 1 January 2020 to 30 September 2020.
  • SME loan guarantee scheme for bank lending: The Coronavirus SME Guarantee scheme will provide a guarantee of 50% to SME lenders for new unsecured loans to be used for working capital.
  • Regional and sector support: The Government has set aside an initial $1 billion to support regions, communities and industries that have been disproportionately affected by the economic impacts of the pandemic, including those heavily reliant on industries such as tourism, agriculture and education.
  • Subsidy for child care providers: The Government will pay 50% of the sector’s fee revenue up to the existing hourly rate cap based on a point in time before parents started withdrawing their children in large numbers, but only so long as services remain open and do not charge families for care.
ATO concessions
  • Deferring tax payments: Tax payment dates will be deferred by up to six months for tax amounts due through the BAS (this was initially announced as four months). This includes PAYG instalments, income tax assessments, FBT assessments and excise.
  • Varying PAYG instalments: The ATO has allowed businesses to vary their PAYG instalment amounts to zero for the March 2020 quarter. That is, a quarterly PAYG instalments payer can vary its PAYG instalments on its activity statement for the March 2020 quarter. Businesses that vary their PAYG instalment to zero can also claim a refund for any instalments made during the 2019–2020 financial year (ie for the September 2019 and December 2019 quarters).
  • ATO automatic lodgment deferrals: The ATO has advised that lodgment and payment deferrals will be automatically applied to the following obligations due on 15 May 2020: company 2018–2019 income tax returns are now due by 5 June 2020, and self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) 2018–2019 annual returns are now due by 30 June 2020. For individuals, partnerships and trusts, the ATO says 2018–2019 income tax returns can be lodged by the 5 June 2020 concessional due date, provided that the taxpayer pays any liability by this date. Finally, the lodgment and payment due date for 2019–2020 FBT annual returns has been automatically deferred from 21 May to 25 June 2020.
  • Remitting interest and penalties: This measure is applicable to certain interest and penalties incurred on or after 23 January 2020 that have been applied to tax liabilities.
  • Low-interest payment plans: These are available to allow affected businesses to enter into low-interest payment plans for their existing and ongoing tax liabilities.
  • Cessation of business: The ATO is taking a practical attitude to those who have to put their business “on hold”.
  • Working from home deductions: The ATO will accept deduction claims using a flat rate of 80c per hour, provided a diary of working hours is kept. This is subject to rules in Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2020/3.
  • Tax agents can enrol clients for JobKeeper: The ATO has advised that agents can enrol on behalf of their clients for the JobKeeper Payment program.
  • Corporate residency and central management and control: Where a foreign incorporated company that is not an Australian tax resident has had to make alternative arrangements for board meetings because of COVID-19 travel restrictions, concessions will be made when determining if the central management and control is in Australia.
  • Permanent establishment (PE): The ATO says a foreign incorporated company that is not an Australian tax resident will not be deemed to have an Australian PE where it has an unplanned presence of my employees in Australia due to COVID-19.
  • Significant global entity (SGE) penalty: The ATO will remit the significant global entity (SGE) penalty for a period of 30 days from the lodgment date of the approved form, including for the general purpose financial statement (GPFS) lodgment, under certain circumstances.
  • PAYG withholding and foreign employers: The ATO does not expect foreign employers to register for PAYG withholding if the only reason that a foreign employee is now working in Australia (but not otherwise a resident of Australia) is the impacts of COVID-19 on travel, and it is anticipated that they will leave before 30 June 2020.
  • FBT: If entities provide or pay for goods or services to assist employees who are sick, or are at risk of becoming sick, with COVID-19, this will generally be exempt from FBT if the benefit is provided for their immediate relief.
  • Switching to monthly GST reporting: Businesses on a quarterly reporting cycle can elect to switch their GST reporting and payment to a monthly cycle to get a quicker GST refund.
ATO concessions: SMSFs
  • SMSF annual returns: The ATO has automatically deferred until 30 June 2020 the lodgment due date for the 2018–2019 SMSF annual return for all funds.
  • SMSF temporary rent reductions: The ATO has confirmed that it will not take compliance action for the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 financial years where an SMSF landlord gives a tenant (who is also a related party) a temporary rent reduction during this period.
  • Related-party limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) and temporary rent reductions: If an SMSF with an otherwise compliant LRBA grants COVID-19 rent repayment relief, reflecting similar terms to what commercial banks are offering, the ATO will accept that the parties are dealing at arm’s length and the non-arm’s length income (NALI) provisions in s 295-550 of ITAA 1997 do not apply. The ATO still expects to see evidence that interest continues to accrue on the loan and that the SMSF trustee will catch up any outstanding principal and interest repayments as soon as possible.
  • In-house assets: If an SMSF exceeds the 5% in-house asset threshold as at 30 June 2020, a plan must be prepared and implemented on or before 30 June 2021. However, the ATO will not undertake compliance activity if the rectification plan could not be executed because the market has not recovered or it was unnecessary to implement the plan as the market had recovered.
  • SMSF residency test: If a trustee or director is stranded overseas due to COVID-19, the ATO will not apply compliance resources to that aspect of the SMSF residency condition in s 295-25 of ITAA 1997.
ASIC
  • AFS licensees and financial advisers: ASIC has granted temporary financial services relief to enable the provision of timely COVID-19 advice (including the early release of super). ASIC has also adopted a temporary no-action position for intra-fund advice by super trustees. Professional bodies have released Record of Advice (RoA) templates to assist members providing clients with COVID-19 advice about the early release of super.
  • ASIC’s regulatory priorities: Until 30 September 2020, ASIC will afford priority to COVID-19 issues and delay less time-critical activities, such as consultations, regulatory reports and reviews (eg executive remuneration, internal dispute resolution and managed discretionary accounts). ASIC will also revise its work on implementing recommendations of the Banking Royal Commission in light of changes to the Parliamentary timetable.
  • Annual general meetings (AGMs) and financial reporting: ASIC has adopted a “take no action” stance in relation to the timing of AGMs and the conduct of AGMs by electronic means.
  • Reporting by unlisted entities: Lodgment deadlines have been extended for unlisted entities, including unlisted public companies, proprietary companies, registered schemes, disclosing entities and AFS licensees.
  • Directors’ duties: Despite the temporary COVID-19 relief for financially distressed businesses, ASIC has reminded directors that they must still comply with their other statutory and common law duties, including the duties to act with due care, skill and diligence; to act in the best interests of the company as a whole; and to not use their position to gain an advantage.
  • Unlicensed advice by real estate agents: ASIC has warned estate agents not to advise tenants who are unable to pay their rent to apply for the early release of their super.
APRA
  • APRA’s regulatory priorities: until 30 September 2020, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has suspended the majority of its planned policy and supervision initiatives. It will focus on monitoring entities for key financial settings, such as capital and liquidity. APRA has also suspended all substantive public consultations and actions to finalise revisions to the prudential framework that are currently underway or upcoming. However, APRA may still progress certain data reporting initiatives that are related to the impacts of COVID-19.
  • APRA prudential and reporting standards: APRA has deferred the start dates for six prudential and reporting standards that have been finalised but are yet to fully come into effect.
  • APRA data collection: APRA has suspended for six months its project to replace the Direct to APRA (D2A) data collection tool with its APRA Connect data collection solution.
Financial institutions
  • Bank loan deferrals: Banks will defer loan repayments for six months for small businesses with total business loan facilities up to $10 million who need assistance because of COVID-19.
  • Commercial property landlords: The banks have agreed not to enforce business loans for non-financial breaches of the loan contract (such as changes in valuations). This concession is subject to the landlord complying with the mandatory National Code of Conduct for commercial leasing principles during COVID-19.
  • Bank assistance for JobKeeper: The major banks have agreed to set up a dedicated hotline for customers needing to access bridging finance to pay their staff ahead of receiving money under the JobKeeper program. The banks have also agreed to expedite the processing of those JobKeeper applications.

JobKeeper: common questions to the ATO

The ATO has updated its webpages – one for employers and one for employees – that provide answers to some common JobKeeper questions. These pages are being regularly updated, so it is worth keeping an eye on them. The following highlights some of the more noteworthy items.

  • Super is not included: The ATO confirms that the minimum $1,500 payment does not include the amount contributed as super to meet super guarantee obligations. However, it does include super contributions made under a salary sacrifice arrangement. For example, assume an employer pays an employee $1,400 per fortnight before tax, plus contributes $133 super per fortnight (ie 9.5%) to meet super guarantee obligations. This would not meet the requirements for the minimum payment to the employee.
  • Out-of-sync pay cycles: Employers are not required to change pay cycles to correspond with JobKeeper fortnights. What is important is that employees are paid at some time during the JobKeeper fortnight. However, if the employer usually pays their employees less frequently, the payment can be allocated between fortnights in “a reasonable manner”. For example, if employees are paid monthly, the employer will still be entitled to receive a JobKeeper Payment, provided that the employees received the monthly equivalent of $1,500 per fortnight.
  • Proof of participation: The ATO cannot provide a letter (eg to a bank) confirming that an employer has enrolled in the JobKeeper Payment scheme. However, the employer themselves can provide the bank with the information used as part of the JobKeeper enrolment process, including the JobKeeper receipt number and the number of eligible employees.
  • Eligibility cut-off: If an employer does not satisfy the “decline in turnover” test for the current month or quarter, it can still assess its eligibility at a later date. To qualify later, the turnover month can be May, June, July, August or September 2020, provided the relevant JobKeeper fortnight has ended that month or an earlier month. If the turnover for a quarter is being used, it can be the quarter:
  • from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020; or
  • from 1 July 2020 to 30 September 2020 – but only if first seeking to qualify for fortnights ending in July 2020 or later.
  • Turnover recovery: Employers only need to satisfy the “decline in turnover” test once to be entitled to JobKeeper payments (and remain entitled). For example, having satisfied it for March 2020 (compared in March 2019) is sufficient – even if the business recovers to previous levels after this (eg if things pick up in May).
  • Reporting current turnover: Employers needed to report their April current GST turnover and May projected GST turnover to the ATO by 31 May 2020 (not 7 May as originally announced). Note, though, that the approved form that entities use to report their monthly GST turnover for April is also used to identify eligible employees, religious practitioners and/or a business participant each month. This confirmation will need to be made for the ATO to be satisfied that the entity is entitled to a JobKeeper Payment. This means that if an employer reported its April GST turnover amounts later than 7 May 2020, its JobKeeper Payment will also be delayed.
  • Evidence of turnover decline: In terms of proving projected GST turnover for a test period, “relevant evidence that would support a prediction of sales likely to be made” may include:
  • a decline in sales during the turnover test period or since 1 March 2020 as a result of government COVID-19 restrictions;
  • customers cancelling or modifying existing contracts for sales on or from 1 March 2020;
  • being required to close or pausing the business due to government COVID-19 restrictions;
  • delays in being able to get access to trading stock sourced from overseas on or from 1 March 2020;
  • evidence of a business’s reliance on tourism;
  • any consequential effect on the price of supplies, eg the effect on the market value of new property being sold by a developer;
  • information known to the business, whether or not publicly available;
  • economic forecasts undertaken by a reputable organisation that are relevant to the type of business; and
  • the likely timing of government COVID-19 restrictions being lifted for employer’s type of business, based on government announcements.
  • Incorrect assessments of turnover: If, at a later stage, it eventuates that actual turnover for a test period is greater than the projected turnover, the employer will not lose access to JobKeeper. The ATO will accept the assessment of these turnovers, unless it has reason to believe that the calculation of projected GST turnover was not reasonable. If there is a significant difference, the ATO may need to assess whether the assessment was reasonable, so there is a need to keep good records of calculations and the assumptions behind them.
  • Job change: If an employee changes jobs after 1 March 2020, the new employer will not be eligible to claim JobKeeper Payments for that employee. However, there are some limited exceptions that may apply when a person is re-employed within the same corporate group.
  • Other income of employees stood down: An employee who has been stood down can earn income from another job while the original employer is receiving JobKeeper Payments for the employee, provided the employee maintains employment (including while being stood down) with the JobKeeper-eligible employer.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/General/JobKeeper-Payment/In-detail/Employers–frequently-asked-JobKeeper-questions/; www.ato.gov.au/General/JobKeeper-Payment/In-detail/Employees–frequently-asked-JobKeeper-questions/.

JobKeeper: measuring decline in turnover

Law Companion Ruling LCR 2020/1, issued on 4 May 2020 and effective from 9 April 2020, explains various aspects of the JobKeeper “decline in turnover” test and also sets out practical compliance approaches that an entity can apply to calculate its turnover. The Ruling is intended to supplement guidance already available on the ATO website. The ATO says it decided to issue a (non-binding) ruling as it continues to receive questions about some aspects of the test.

Background

Businesses (including sole traders and charities) must have suffered a “substantial decline” in turnover to qualify for the JobKeeper Payment of $1,500 per eligible employee. The basic decline in turnover test is linked to the GST turnover test (in Div 188 of the GST Act) and requires an entity to measure its projected GST turnover for a turnover test period in 2020 and compare this to the current GST turnover for a relevant comparison period in 2019. In particular, an entity needs to allocate supplies made, or likely to be made, to a turnover test period or relevant comparison period based on when the supply is made or is likely to be made, and to then determine the value of those supplies. Any shortfall is to be expressed as a percentage. If this equals or exceeds specified thresholds, the entity satisfies the decline in turnover test.

An alternative turnover test may be available if an entity’s circumstances do not fit the basic test rules. The alternative tests are not addressed in LCR 2020/1.

Issues covered by LCR 2020/1

Ruling LCR 2020/1 discusses in some detail the following aspects of the basic decline in turnover test:

  • Step A: the supplies that are included in projected GST turnover and current GST turnover;
  • Step B: allocating supplies to the right period; and
  • Step C: determining the value of each supply allocated to a relevant period.

The Ruling then sets out practical compliance approaches that effectively allow entities to work out Steps B and C simultaneously.

Practical compliance approaches: alternative methods

The ATO accepts that there may be practical compliance difficulties in linking amounts received or invoiced based strictly on the time a supply is made or likely to be made. Ruling LCR 2020/1 outlines the following alternative methods which, if applied in good faith, can be used as a proxy to determine the value of supplies (Steps B and C):

  • Accrual accounting: Entities can use the GST-exclusive revenue from making supplies that would be recognised in financial accounts prepared in accordance with accounting principles as a proxy for the value of supplies made or likely to be made in a turnover test period. This method extends to entities that account for GST on a cash basis.
  • GST attribution basis: The total GST-exclusive value of supplies that would be allocated to a relevant period under the GST attribution rules (assuming the relevant period was also a GST reporting period) can be used as a proxy for the value of supplies made or likely to be made in a relevant period. For non-taxable supplies, entities should use the GST attribution rules as if they applied in the same way as they do for taxable supplies and as if the relevant period was a reporting period for GST purposes. If the amounts used for GST reporting purposes do not reflect the value of the supplies for the decline in turnover test, entities should ensure they include the value of the supply when the GST may have been calculated on a different basis (eg the full value of a supply of real property and not just the margin).

Entities that are not registered for GST may use the same accounting method that they use for income tax purposes. This involves treating the income or gains that are, or are likely to be, derived in a relevant period for income tax purposes as being the value of the supplies made, or likely to be made, in that relevant period.

An entity that chooses to use one of these alternative methods must use the same method, and apply it consistently, for both relevant periods. The entity also needs to keep reasonable records to show which method was used.

The ATO emphasises that an entity will not lose access to JobKeeper payments if its actual turnover for the turnover test period turns out to be greater than the prediction of projected turnover. The ATO will accept an entity’s assessment of these turnovers unless there is reason to believe that the calculation of projected GST turnover was not reasonable.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/law/view/view.htm?docid=%22COG%2FLCR20201%2FNAT%2FATO%2F00001%22.

STP exemption for small employers extended to July 2021

The ATO has announced that it has extended the Single Touch Payroll (STP) exemption for small employers in relation to closely held payees from 1 July 2020 to 1 July 2021 in response to COVID-19.

This STP exemption for closely held payees applies automatically and small employers do not need to apply to the ATO to access it. However, employers should keep records to support their decision to apply the concession. Alternatively, an employer can notify the ATO and apply for the exemption through the online Business Portal – select “Manage employees”, then “STP deferrals and exemptions”, and then “Exemption”. A registered tax agent can also apply for an exemption on behalf of a client.

If a small employer has any other employees (also known as arm’s length employees), the ATO says they must be reported through STP on or before each payday, unless the employer is eligible for the reporting concession available to micro employers (those with one to four employees). Micro employers who need more time to move to STP reporting can ask their registered tax or BAS agent to report on their behalf on a quarterly basis. This can continue until 30 June 2021.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Business/Single-Touch-Payroll/Concessional-reporting/Closely-held-payees/.

Foreign employment income and the impact of COVID-19

The ATO has issued a fact sheet for taxpayers who have returned to Australia as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to address their status in regards of the income tax exemption for foreign earnings. Foreign earnings include salary, wages, commissions, bonuses and allowances earned from engagement in foreign service.

An Australian resident deriving foreign earnings from service in a foreign country may be entitled to an income tax exemption on those foreign earnings under s 23AG of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). This exemption can only apply where the foreign earnings are from a continuous period of service in the foreign country that lasts for at least 91 days.

The fact sheet applies where a taxpayer has returned to Australia from foreign service as a result of the pandemic and had:

  • undertaken 91 days of continuous foreign service that qualifies for the income tax exemption, but had expected to complete further foreign service prior to returning to Australia; or
  • commenced foreign service that otherwise would have qualified for the income tax exemption, however the taxpayer had not yet completed 91 days of continuous foreign service at the time of return.

If the taxpayer had already completed 91 days of continuous foreign service and met all the other requirements in s 23AG, the foreign earnings earned while undertaking the foreign service will remain exempt income. This includes income earned after return which is related to that period of foreign service, even if it is paid after the return (eg wages paid in arrears and paid recreation leave that accrued during the period of foreign service). However, if they had not yet completed 91 days of continuous foreign service, any foreign earnings from that period of foreign service are not exempt and therefore will be assessable.

While temporary absences from foreign service (such as time spent in Australia) still count as a period of foreign service, the ATO says that an absence from foreign service because a person returns to Australia as a result of COVID-19 and commences working in Australia is not a temporary absence from foreign service that falls into the s 23AG exceptions, because the person is returning without knowing when they can recommence their service in the foreign country. In the ATO’s view, this time in Australia cannot be characterised as a short work-related trip.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/law/view/view.htm?docid=%22AFS%2F23AG-COVID-19%2F00001%22.

Rental properties and the impact of COVID-19

The ATO has updated its webpage that addresses questions about residential rental properties and the financial impact of COVID-19. Some of the more interesting issues are outlined here.

  • Reduced or temporary cessation of rent: If tenants are not meeting their payment obligations under the lease agreement due to COVID-19 and a landlord continues to incur normal expenses on the property, the landlord will still be able to claim those expenses.
  • Reduced rent to assist tenants affected by COVID-19: If landlords reduce rent to enable tenants to remain in the property (thereby maximising rental return in a changed rental market), there will be no corresponding reduction for rental property expenses.
  • Back payments/insurance: Receipts of back payment of rent or an amount of insurance for lost rent should be declared as income in the tax year in which the amounts are received.
  • Interest on deferred bank loans: If a bank defers loan repayments for a period of time as a result of COVID-19, any interest accrued will be deductible.
  • Instant asset write-off: The new instant asset write-off deduction is not available for property investors.

Private use of short-term accommodation

The ATO has also addressed a number of questions related to short-term accommodation being used for private purposes.

One question asks whether, in relation to a property that has suffered rental downturn due to COVID-19, the owner will be able to continue to deduct expenses associated with this property in the same proportion as before COVID-19 for the period when demand is adversely affected. The ATO says that the amount to be claimed will depend on how the property had been used before COVID-19 and how the owner planned to use it during the period that is now affected by the pandemic. If the reason for the adverse effect on demand for the property is COVID-19 (or the bushfires immediately beforehand), the owner can continue to deduct expenses associated with the property in the same proportion as they were entitled to deduct before the pandemic (or the bushfires). However, if they had started to use the property in a different way beforehand, the proportion of expenses to be claimed as a deduction may change. The ATO provides the following examples of changed use:

  • increased private use of the property by the owner, their family or their friends; and
  • a decision to permanently stop renting out the property once the COVID-19 restrictions end.

A flow-on question involves a taxpayer using a holiday home to self-isolate and whether deductions can continue to be claimed, given that the taxpayer was unable to rent the property commercially. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the ATO says that the increased private usage will reduce the amount that the taxpayer can claim.

The last question addresses rental advertising and is interesting. If a taxpayer stops paying for advertising during the COVID-19 lockdown period, can deductions associated with holding the property still be claimed? It is worth quoting the ATO’s answer in full:

“It depends on a wider range of factors, not just one. Whether active and bona fide efforts are made to ensure a property is available for rent is only one factor to consider when determining the appropriate method to apportion deductions for a short term rental property. You would need to consider how the property had been used before COVID-19 and how you plan to use it during the period now adversely affected by COVID-19.

During this time we acknowledge it may be a reasonable commercial decision to temporarily reduce the level of paid advertising for your property, depending on the restrictions in your property’s locality. However, this factor alone doesn’t necessarily determine the allowable proportion of your deductions.”

Source: www.ato.gov.au/general/covid-19/covid-19-frequently-asked-questions/individuals-frequently-asked-questions/?anchor=Residentialrentalproperties#Residentialrentalproperties.

Processing of super early releases resumes with extra risk filters

Processing of COVID-19 early release of superannuation applications resumed 11 May 2020 after the ATO added extra risk filters for all files that are delivered to super funds.

This followed the “pausing” of early release requests on 8 May 2020 so that the ATO could consider further enhancements to its systems to help protect individuals’ personal data. Out of an abundance of caution, the ATO “paused” the early release of super requests being sent to super funds until 11 May. This was to enable the ATO to make sure there was nothing more that could be done to help individuals protect personal data to ensure they don’t become victims of identity theft, said Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar.

In an update on 11 May, Mr Sukkar said the ATO had identified a small number of third parties who could be susceptible to new techniques criminals are using to try to steal personal data. The ATO is working with these third parties to help them make security enhancements, Mr Sukkar said. The additional risk filters will now be applied by the ATO on all files before they are delivered to super funds. Further information will be provided to funds to assist them in discharging their own obligations to apply fraud prevention processes.

The ATO has also reminded people to be vigilant about how they store and share their personal information. An individual’s myGov log-in should never be shared with anyone, including their tax agent, Mr Sukkar said. Also be wary of emails or text messages that request personal information. The ATO will never send taxpayers a direct link to log on to ATO online services.

Appearing before the Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 on 7 May 2020, Australian Federal Police (AFP) Commissioner Reece Kershaw said the AFP was in the early stages of an investigation into fraud attempts against the super early release scheme, with five search warrants executed. So far, there are up to 150 victims. The AFP said it has identified some bank accounts and had them frozen, with $120,000 all up.

The Assistant Treasurer added that the AFP is investigating one incident that might involve around 150 individuals. Tax Commissioner Chris Jordan has also confirmed that the ATO’s systems have not been compromised. Mr Jordan has called on all taxpayers to be extraordinarily careful about keeping their personal information, such as their date of birth and Tax File Number (TFN) private and secure.

Source: https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/michael-sukkar-2019/transcripts/interview-laura-jayes-first-edition-sky-news-0; https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/michael-sukkar-2019/media-releases/processing-early-release-superannuation-applications; https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%
22committees%2Fcommsen%2F0c5c7e36-6300-484b-b9c3-ed5847b7ce91%2F0000%22

Directors’ duties still apply despite COVID-19 relief

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has reminded companies, directors and officers faced with COVID-19 challenges to reflect on their fundamental duties to act with due care, skill and diligence, and to act in the best interests of the company.

ASIC Commissioner John Price has said the impacts of COVID-19 will require many companies to focus on and, most likely, recalibrate aspects of their corporate strategy, risk-management framework, and funding and capital management, among other things. This will require directors to reflect on which stakeholders’ interests need to be factored into decisions – including employees, investors and creditors. This continues to be the case in areas where temporary relief has been provided from specific obligations under the law, Mr Price said. For example, the Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Act 2020 has granted temporary relief for financially distressed businesses (s 588GAAA of the Corporations Act 2001). The temporary safe harbour provides relief for directors from potential personal liability for insolvent trading.

ASIC notes that a director wishing to rely on the temporary safe harbour measure “bears an evidential burden” to prove that the requirements of the temporary safe harbour provisions are met. According to ASIC, it may need to be shown that the debt was not effectively incurred before 25 March 2020. Even though temporary relief is provided from the insolvent trading provisions, ASIC said the relief does not extend to relief from statutory and common law directors’ duties. These include the duty to act in the best interests of the company as a whole (which can involve directors taking into account the interests of stakeholders beyond shareholders, including creditors, when the company is in financial distress). These duties also involve the duty to act with care, diligence and good faith and not to use a director’s position or information they have obtained as a director to gain an advantage or cause detriment to the company.

Finally, ASIC will maintain enforcement activities and continue to investigate and take action where the public interest warrants it. Whether action is taken depends on the assessment of all relevant circumstances, including what a director or officer could reasonably have foreseen at the time of taking relevant decisions or incurring debts, Mr Price said.

Source: https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/articles/directors-duties-in-the-context-of-covid-19/

 

Client Alert – June 2020

Treasury revises down estimated JobKeeper cost by $60 billion

The ATO and Treasury have released a joint statement advising that the previous estimate of the number of employers who would access the JobKeeper program was significantly overstated. Treasury now estimates the number of employees covered under the JobKeeper program to be around 3.5 million (down from a previous estimate of 6.5 million). The estimated cost of JobKeeper has been revised down to around $70 billion (from the original $130 billion estimate).

The overstatement has been attributed to errors made when employers applied for JobKeeper. For example, when estimating their eligibility over 500 businesses with only a single eligible employee actually reported the dollar amount that they expected to receive per fortnightly JobKeeper payment (1,500) instead of the number of their eligible employees (1).

Importantly, this error has no consequences for JobKeeper payments already made, as payments under the scheme depend on the subsequent declaration that businesses make in relation to each and every eligible employee. This declaration does not involve estimates and requires an employer to provide the Tax File Number (TFN) for each eligible employee.

Snapshot of Federal COVID-19 pandemic measures

Tax-related business measures
  • Cash flow boost payments: Tax-free payments of up to $100,000 are available for eligible small and medium sized entities and not-for-profits (including charities) that employ people, with a minimum payment of $20,000.
  • Instant asset write-off: From 12 March to 30 June 2020, the threshold increases to $150,000 for business entities with aggregated annual turnover of less than $50 million.
  • Accelerated depreciation: Businesses with aggregated turnover of less than $500 million can deduct capital allowances for depreciating assets at an accelerated rate. This measure extends over the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 income years.
  • Research and Development (R&D) Tax Incentive: The Government has deferred the lodgment dates for R&D Tax Incentive applications for 2018–2019 until 30 September 2020.
Superannuation
  • Superannuation early release: Eligible people affected by COVID-19 can apply to release (tax-free) up to $10,000 of their superannuation in 2019–2020 and up to $10,000 in 2020–2021.
  • Temporary residents: Certain temporary residents impacted by COVID-19 may apply for early release of up to $10,000 of their super by 30 June 2020.
  • Super pension drawdowns reduced: The minimum annual payment amounts for certain pensions and annuities have been temporarily reduced by 50% for 2019–2020 and 2020–2021.
Social security and support
  • Fortnightly Coronavirus Supplement: This $550 supplement is available for six months for job seekers, sole traders, students and some others. It effectively doubles the current payment for new and existing social security recipients from 27 April 2020. It will be paid for six months to both existing and new recipients of the JobSeeker Payment, Sickness Allowance, Youth Allowance for jobseekers, Parenting Payment Partnered, Parenting Payment Single, Partner Allowance, Sickness Allowance and Farm Household Allowance.
  • Stimulus payments for income support recipients: The first $750 cash stimulus payment has now gone out to 6.8 million eligible pensioners, carers, disability support pensioners, those on family tax benefits and concession card holders. A second $750 payment will be made from 13 July 2020 for eligible income recipients and concession card holders.
  • Regional and sector support: The Government has set aside an initial $1 billion to support regions, communities and industries that have been disproportionately affected by the economic impacts of the pandemic, including those heavily reliant on industries such as tourism, agriculture and education.
ATO concessions
  • Deferring tax payments: Tax payment dates will be deferred by up to six months for tax amounts due through the BAS. This includes PAYG instalments, income tax assessments, FBT assessments and excise.
  • Varying PAYG instalments: The ATO has allowed businesses to vary their PAYG instalment amounts to zero for the March 2020 quarter. Businesses that vary their PAYG instalment to zero can also claim a refund for any instalments made during the 2019–2020 financial year.
  • ATO automatic lodgment deferrals: Company 2018–2019 income tax returns are now due by 5 June 2020 and SMSF 2018–2019 annual returns by 30 June 2020. For individuals, partnerships and trusts, 2018–2019 income tax returns can be lodged by the 5 June 2020 concessional due date. Finally, the due date for 2019–2020 FBT annual returns has been deferred to 25 June 2020.
  • Working from home deductions: The ATO will accept tax deduction claims using a flat rate of 80c per hour, provided a diary of working hours is kept.
  • FBT: If entities provide or pay for goods or services to assist employees who are sick or are at risk of becoming sick with COVID-19, this will generally be exempt from FBT if the benefit is provided for their immediate relief.
  • Switching to monthly GST reporting: Businesses on a quarterly reporting cycle can elect to switch their GST reporting and payment to a monthly cycle to get a quicker GST refund.
Financial institutions
  • Bank loan deferrals: Banks will defer loan repayments for six months for small businesses with total business loan facilities up to $10 million who need assistance because of COVID-19.
  • Bank assistance for JobKeeper: The major banks have agreed to set up a dedicated hotline for customers needing to access bridging finance to pay their staff ahead of receiving money under the JobKeeper program. The banks have also agreed to expedite the processing of those JobKeeper applications.

JobKeeper: measuring decline in turnover

Businesses (including sole traders and charities) must have suffered a “substantial decline” in turnover to qualify for the JobKeeper Payment of $1,500 per eligible employee. The basic decline in turnover test requires an entity to measure its projected GST turnover for a turnover test period in 2020 and compare this to the current GST turnover for a relevant comparison period in 2019. In particular, the entity needs to allocate supplies made, or likely to be made, to a turnover test period or relevant comparison period based on when the supply is made or is likely to be made, and to then determine the value of those supplies. Any shortfall is to be expressed as a percentage. If this equals or exceeds specified thresholds, the entity satisfies the decline in turnover test.

The ATO has recently issued Law Companion Ruling LCR 2020/1, a non-binding ruling that explains various aspects of the test and sets out practical compliance approaches for calculating turnover.

STP exemption for small employers extended to July 2021

The ATO has extended the Single Touch Payroll (STP) exemption for small employers in relation to closely held payees from 1 July 2020 to 1 July 2021 in response to COVID-19.

This STP exemption for closely held payees applies automatically and small employers do not need to apply to the ATO to access it. However, employers should keep records to support their decision to apply the concession.

Processing of super early releases resumes with extra risk filters

Processing of COVID-19 early release of superannuation applications has now resumed, with the ATO adding extra risk filters for all files that are delivered to super funds. These release requests had been temporarily paused between 8 May and 11 May 2020 so that the ATO could consider enhancements to its systems to help protect individuals’ personal data.

Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar recently reported that the ATO had identified a small number of third parties who could be susceptible to new techniques that criminals are using to try to steal personal data. The ATO has now worked with these third parties to help them make security enhancements, Mr Sukkar said, and the resulting additional risk filters will be applied on all files before they are delivered to super funds.

Directors’ duties still apply despite COVID-19 relief

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has reminded companies, directors and officers faced with COVID-19 challenges to reflect on their fundamental duties to act with due care, skill and diligence, and to act in the best interests of the company.

ASIC Commissioner John Price has said the impacts of COVID-19 will require many companies to focus on and, most likely, recalibrate aspects of their corporate strategy, risk-management framework, and funding and capital management, among other things. This will require directors to reflect on which stakeholders’ interests need to be factored into decisions – including employees, investors and creditors. This is still the case even in areas where temporary relief has been provided from specific obligations under the law.

ASIC will maintain its enforcement activities and continue to investigate and take action where the public interest warrants it. Whether action is taken depends on the assessment of all relevant circumstances, including what a director or officer could reasonably have foreseen at the time of taking relevant decisions or incurring debts.

Do you or your business need help?

If you or your business need help with your financial arrangements during this difficult time, we can help you to work out which of the many corona virus (COVID-19) related payments, concessions and arrangements apply to you, and how you can best make use of them. Contact us today.

 

Being ‘stood down’ is not being sacked

Accountants are fielding lots of questions in the COVID-19 shutdown. One of the most confusing is about standing down staff.

IN BRIEF –
  • While being ‘stood down’ sounds like a retrenchment or redundancy, it is not the same.
  • Standing down measures are being used to try to save companies from going under and, ultimately, retain workers’ jobs.
  • A stand down is a temporary measure; there must be an intent to reopen the business.

On 19 March 2020, after the Australian government warned people to stop travelling overseas, Qantas announced it would stand down 20,000 workers in a measure to “preserve as many jobs as possible”. Gym chains, fashion retailers and casinos have also stood down employees during the pandemic, and many more organisations may do the same in months to come.

While being ‘stood down’ sounds much like a retrenchment or redundancy, it actually refers to something else entirely. It is one of many measures being used by organisations to try to save companies from going under and, ultimately, keep as many jobs as possible after the crisis. In their position on the front line of COVID-19 recovery, accountants are fielding questions from all directions about what employers should do.

“Any [questions about] standing down measures are really best suited to an employment lawyer, so I have referred clients to one where they were contemplating this,” says Kylie Parker CA, director of Lotus Accountants in Sydney.

“My clients are reducing pay and seeking to obtain the JobKeeper payments, where eligible, to ensure they can remain ready to go back to ‘business as usual’ post lockdown,” she adds.

Natalie Lennon CA, founder and director of Two Sides accounting practice, says she is also referring clients to employment lawyers. “It is a minefield,” she says.

So what are employment lawyers saying?

When an employee is stood down, they keep their job. Stand downs under Section 524 of the Fair Work Act are traditionally for reasons outside the employer’s control: “[Things like] earthquakes, bushfires, ‘act-of-god’ type circumstances where, say, a plant is flooded and no one can come in,” explains industrial lawyer Andrew Bland, principal at BlandsLaw in Sydney. Now, under temporary amendments to the Act, an employer can give employees a ‘JobKeeper enabling stand down direction’ if the employee can’t be usefully employed for their usual days or hours because of changes to the business due to the coronavirus crisis or because of government initiatives to slow its transmission.

If turnover has fallen or is likely to fall by more than 30 per cent (or 50 per cent if turnover is more than $1 billion), an employer can direct an employee to work at a different, suitable workplace, for fewer days or hours or no hours at all. Employers can request staff members take some annual leave or change their days or time of work, and the staff cannot unreasonably refuse.

Stood-down employees are still regarded as being on the books, so continue to accrue their leave entitlements.

Usefully employed

“[Coronavirus] affects large and different sections of the community but not all parts of the workforce,” says Bland. “Those in a white-collar area who can work from home won’t be as affected as, for example, pilots who are grounded because the government mandates planes can’t fly.”

‘Usefully employed’ doesn’t mean any job. “It has to be applicable to the expertise,” says Anthony Blaney, principal consultant at Pitcher Partners Melbourne, whose 15 years in the field include senior HR roles with WorkSafe Victoria and Qantas. JobKeeper gives flexibility for changing job roles. An employer can direct an employee to perform any duties they’re qualified to do, providing those tasks are reasonably within the scope of the business’s operations.

A temporary fix

A stand down also needs to be temporary; it’s not a way to delay the inevitable.

“I’ve had clients who’ve decided it’s time to shut. The virus is the final nail,” says Bland, who’s been in practice for 25 years. “Where there’s no intention to reopen, that will be a redundancy [not a stand down].”

Stood down staff are eligible for JobKeeper payments, can work elsewhere or access superannuation, but Bland says stand downs should be viewed as “a second-last resort, the last being redundancy”.

He has watched employers get creative with leave at half-pay, reducing hours or salary.

“I’ve seen organisations act swiftly to offer compassionate leave for people without leave balances,” says Blaney. “This is not something all companies can do, but they’re doing their best to protect jobs.”

Blaney urges employers to keep up communication at this time. “People will remember empathy in the time of crisis, flexibility and thinking outside the square,” he says. “This is about survival but you also have to plan ahead for post-coronavirus, because there will come a day, we all hope, when we return to normality.”

Michael Croker CA, CA ANZ’s Australian tax leader, says employees will have a lot of questions; in some situations, employers will need to deliver bad news to those excluded from the JobKeeper allowance.

“Employees who’ve already been stood down may now ask their former boss about the possibility of re-hiring arrangements. Eligible employees will want to know how their employment arrangements will be changed: their hours, adjusted salary and entitlements,” he says.

“Depending on the business’s circumstances, ‘JobKeeper enabling stand down’ arrangements and ‘JobKeeper enabling directions’ may need to be designed and communicated to employees.

“To cope with all these questions, accountants and employers will need to develop a working understanding of the temporary changes which the legislation makes to the Fair Work Act.”

‘JobKeeper enabling stand down’ allows for a qualifying employer to direct an employee to work fewer hours or days (including no hours) if they can’t be usefully employed due to the COVID-19 pandemic or government-directed lockdown.

‘JobKeeper enabling directions’ permits a qualifying employer to change an employee’s usual duties and location of work, and to make agreements with employees to change their days and times of work and take annual leave in certain circumstances.

Source: https://www.acuitymag.com/ Article by Alison Boleyn.

Explanatory Memorandum – April 2020

Coronavirus cash flow boost payments explained

As a part of the second round of economic stimulus in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian Government has legislated a measure to boost cash flow for employers. Put simply, the cash flow boost payments are intended to support employment by providing Federal support for employers through the tax system. This is admirable yet is likely to prove complex to administer.

Small to medium employers who intend to claim the “cash flow boost payment” (a minimum of $10,000 and a maximum of $50,000) and hoping to receive an injection of cash should beware. The “payment” is not actually a payment; rather, it is a credit that will be offset against the liabilities that appear on the business activity statement (BAS) and any debits in a taxpayer’s running balance account (RBA). While this is still likely to support employment by reducing the amount businesses have to pay to the ATO, anyone hoping to get a cash injection will be sorely disappointed.

The measure ensures that an eligible employer receives an amount equal to three times the amount of tax withheld from ordinary salary and wages as disclosed in the March monthly BAS, or equal to the amount of tax withheld from ordinary salary and wages for the quarter. Both are subject to a minimum of $10,000 and a maximum of $50,000. The payment is due on 28 April 2020 and other payments will follow later this year.

The cash flow boost payments are only available to entities that qualified as small or medium entities (ie with turnover less than $50 million) for the income year when they were most recently assessed. There will be no cash flow boost payments for entities with turnover greater than $50 million. There is also a withholding requirement – the payment will only be made to entities that first notified the ATO that they have a withholding obligation through the lodgment of a BAS or an instalment activity statement (IAS) for the period.

Therefore, the key to the system is the BAS that entities lodge for March (either monthly or quarterly). That BAS will determine how much is paid, and when it is paid.

A word of caution, however. The headline numbers (and dates) can be a tad misleading. This “boost” measure is not a minimum $10,000 payment – instead, it is an entitlement to a minimum gross credit of $10,000 in respect of the March BAS. This credit will be offset against the liabilities that appear on the BAS and any debits in a taxpayer’s RBA. This may result in refund, but more likely for most taxpayers will result in a reduction in the amount they owe to the ATO.

Even assuming that the ATO owes the taxpayer money, that refund will not be paid on 28 April, but rather within 14 days of lodging the BAS. The ATO has already stated that lodging a BAS early will not give rise to an early payment of the first cash flow boost payment.

Another important feature to note is that eligibility is subject to a specific integrity rule to overcome artificial or contrived arrangements or schemes. The ATO has stated that a “scheme” for these purposes includes restructuring a business or the way an entity usually pays its workers to fall within the eligibility criteria, as well as increasing wages paid in a particular month to maximise the cash flow boost payment amount.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Business/Business-activity-statements-(BAS)/In-detail/Boosting-cash-flow-for-employers/.

Understanding the JobKeeper Payment scheme

Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg registered the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 on 9 April 2020. These statutory rules set out the actual rules and taxpayer requirements for the JobKeeper Payment scheme, which will be administered by the ATO. The statutory rules complement the JobKeeper Payment legislation, the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020, which was passed by Parliament on 8 April 2020.

The JobKeeper Payment scheme commenced on 30 March and will finish on 27 September 2020. It will operate on a fortnightly basis. The first fortnight commenced on 30 March and the last will end with the fortnight ending on 27 September. Employers and eligible recipients must qualify on a (rolling) fortnightly basis.

Businesses (including sole traders and charities) must have suffered a “substantial decline” in turnover due to the COVID-19 pandemic to be entitled to the payment of $1,500 for each eligible employee. Critically, it is a condition of entitlement that the business has paid salary and wages of at least that amount to the employee in the fortnight.

The government will pay the JobKeeper Payment within 14 days of the end of the calendar month in which the fortnight(s) end(s). According to the fact sheets Treasury has released, employers will be paid “shortly after the end of each calendar month”, for fortnights ending in that month. This means that the first JobKeeper Payment will not be made until (at least) the first week of May.

An entity is not eligible for the JobKeeper Payment if another employer is claiming it for the same employee.

Definition of a JobKeeper fortnight

An employer receives a JobKeeper Payment in respect of each “JobKeeper fortnight” in which they are entitled to the payment.

Each of the following is a JobKeeper fortnight:

  • the fortnight beginning on 30 March 2020; and
  • each subsequent fortnight, ending with the fortnight ending on 27 September 2020.

This means that the JobKeeper scheme commences on 30 March 2020 and ends on 27 September 2020 – a period of 26 weeks. This means the last fortnight in respect of which a JobKeeper Payment may be paid (under the current rules) is the fortnight commencing on 14 September 2020 and ending on 27 September 2020.

Entities that qualify

For an entity to be eligible for the scheme, there are tests that must be met as at 1 March 2020 and other tests that must be satisfied on a rolling fortnightly basis.

Entities that carried on a business at 1 March 2020 or charities that “pursued [their] objectives” at that time will qualify, provided that they also satisfy the decline in turnover test.

However, the following are specifically excluded:

  • entities that had a levy imposed under the Major Bank Levy Act 2017 imposed for any quarter ending before 1 March 2020;
  • an entity that is an Australian Government agency (or a wholly owned subsidiary of one);
  • an entity that is a local governing body (or a wholly owned subsidiary of one);
  • if the entity is a sovereign entity;
  • if the entity is a company – a liquidator or provisional liquidator has been appointed in relation to the company; or
  • if the entity is an individual – a trustee in bankruptcy has been appointed to the individual’s property.

The exclusion for local government bodies and government agencies means that councils will not be covered by the JobKeeper Payment scheme.

Qualifying employers must apply to the ATO in the approved form and become registered under the scheme prior to the end of a JobKeeper fortnight. Employers must then notify all employees in writing that they have elected to participate in the scheme and that their eligible employees will all be covered by the scheme.

Decline in turnover test

The decline in turnover test is linked to the GST turnover test in Div 188 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (the GST Act), in particular the projected GST turnover – which will take into account anticipated decline in revenue. There are a number of technical modifications to ensure that the test applies as intended.

The test requires an entity to measure its projected GST turnover and compare it to a “relevant comparison period”. Any shortfall is to be expressed as a percentage. If this equals or exceeds the following thresholds, the entity satisfied the decline in turnover test:

  • for ACNC-registered charities: 15%;
  • for entities with turnover less than $1 billion: 30%;
  • for entities with turnover greater than $1 billion: 50%.

Note that universities, schools and local councils will not be covered by the 15% rate.

The $1 billion threshold is determined by reference to “aggregated turnover” as defined in s 328-115 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). This includes the annual turnover of any entity that is connected with or an affiliate of the business.

The turnover test period must be a calendar month that ends after 30 March and before 1 October 2020, or a quarter that starts on 1 April or 1 July 2020. The relevant comparison period must be the period in 2019 that corresponds to this turnover test period. For example, an entity can make the comparison by comparing the whole of the month of March 2020 with March 2019, or by comparing the quarter beginning on 1 April 2020 with the quarter beginning on 1 April 2019.

Once the decline in turnover test is satisfied, the entity does not need to retest its turnover in later months. However, if an entity does not qualify for one month (or quarter), it can test in a later month (or quarter) to determine if the test is met and can become eligible from that time.

Despite the fact that an entity does not need to retest its turnover once the decline in turnover test is satisfied, an entity that has qualified for the JobKeeper Payment must, within seven days of the end of that month, notify the ATO of its current GST turnover for that month and its projected GST turnover for the following month.

Deductible gift recipients (DGRs) are required to include gifts received or likely to be received that are tax deductible to the donor under s 30-15 ITAA 1997. Charities that are registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) but are not DGRs must instead include gifts received or likely to be received that are made by way of monetary donations, property with a value of more than $5,000 and listed Australian shares. For either type of entity, gifts received from an associate are not included in their turnover.

There will undoubtedly be ATO guidance on this.

The turnover numbers must be reported to the ATO before any payments will start, although there is a transitional rule for the first two JobKeeper fortnights.

There is scope for the ATO to apply an alternative test to different classes of entities, by way of legislative instrument. For example, where a business or non-profit organisation was not in operation a year earlier, or where the turnover a year earlier was not representative of the usual or average turnover (eg because the entity was newly established or its turnover is typically highly variable). Although no legislative instrument had been made as at the time of writing, the following example (adapted from an example in the explanatory statement to the statutory rules) shows how the alternative test would apply.

Example

Milly’s Farms carries on a farming and retail flower sales business in Australia. It was subject to a severe drought from 2018 until September 2019 that reduced the amount of flowers it could grow. It returned to normal crop output in January 2020. Its retail flower sales became significantly affected in March 2020.

It assesses its eligibility for JobKeeper Payments on 3 July 2020 based on a projected GST turnover from its farming activities for the quarter beginning on 1 July 2020 of $2 million. The corresponding period is the quarter beginning on 1 July 2019 – a period in which Milly’s Farms was severely affected by drought. Because of the effects of the drought, Milly’s Farms had a much lower than usual 2019 GST turnover of $2.5 million. The July 2020 quarter turnover falls short of the July 2019 quarter turnover by $500,000, which is 25% of the July 2019 quarter turnover. This does not exceed the specified percentage of 30%, so the basic decline in turnover test is not satisfied.

However, because of the effects of the drought on farming businesses, the ATO is satisfied that there is not an appropriate relevant comparison period for an entity that carried on a farming business. Instead, for these entities, the ATO determines an alternative test for which the relevant comparison period is the corresponding quarter in 2017. The ATO determines that the alternative test will be satisfied in these circumstances where the entity can show a 30% shortfall in turnover (for entities with less than $1 billion aggregated annual turnover) when compared to one of these alternative periods.

In the quarter beginning on 1 July 2017, Milly’s Farms had a current GST turnover of $4 million. This represents a shortfall of 50% when compared to its projected GST turnover for the quarter beginning on 1 July 2020. This exceeds the specified percentage of 30%, so the alternative decline in turnover test is satisfied.

Eligible employees

An individual must be employed for a JobKeeper fortnight to be eligible for that fortnight. In addition, as at 1 March 2020 the employee must:

  • be aged 16 or over;
  • be an employee or a long-term casual employee of the entity (12 months of regular and systematic employment); and
  • be an Australia resident, as determined by reference to the Social Security Act 1991, or the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) where the person holds a Subclass 444 (Special Category) visa.

The 1 March date is important, as it allows employees who were retrenched after that date but then subsequently rehired (possibly on the basis of the announcement of the scheme) to be eligible for the JobKeeper Payment. However, if an employee was only engaged after 1 March, that employee would not be eligible for the scheme, because they were not an employee of the eligible employer as at 1 March 2020.

There are some specific exclusions. A person is excluded from being an eligible employee if:

  • parental leave pay is payable to the individual and the individual’s paid parental leave period overlaps with, or includes, the fortnight;
  • at any time during the fortnight, the individual is paid dad and partner pay; or
  • all of the following apply:
  • the individual is totally incapacitated for work throughout the fortnight;
  • an amount is payable to the individual under, or in accordance with, an Australian workers’ compensation law in respect of the individual’s total incapacity for work; and
  • the amount is payable is respect of a period that overlaps with, or includes, the fortnight.

The test is specifically that a person must be employed by an eligible employer “at any time” in the fortnight. The person does not need to be employed for the full fortnight.

There is also a requirement that eligible employees have provided a notice to their employer agreeing:

  • to be nominated by the employer as an eligible employee of that employer under the JobKeeper scheme;
  • that they have not agreed to be nominated by another employer; and
  • that (if they are employed as a casual employee with this employer) they do not have permanent employment with another employer.

An eligible employee who is employed by one or more qualifying employers will need to choose one employer that will receive the JobKeeper Payments for their employment.

Once an employee has nominated an employer and the employer has received JobKeeper Payments in respect of the employee and has paid the employee, the employee cannot nominate a different employer. If for any reason, the employment relationship between an eligible employee and their nominated employer ends, the employee will not be able to have another employer qualify for the JobKeeper Payments in respect of their new employment. The advice then would be to look at eligibility for the JobSeeker Payment.

Wage condition

Employers must satisfy what is termed the “wage condition” to be entitled for a JobKeeper Payment. This is satisfied in respect of an individual for a fortnight if the sum of the following amounts equals or exceeds $1,500:

  • amounts paid by the employer to the individual in the fortnight by way of salary, wages, commissions, bonuses or allowances;
  • amounts withheld by the employer from payments made to the individual in the fortnight under the PAYG provisions (specifically, s 12-35 in Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953);
  • contributions made by the employer in the fortnight to a superannuation fund or a retirement savings account (an RSA) for the benefit of the individual, if the contributions are made under a salary sacrifice arrangement (within the meaning of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992);
  • other amounts that, in the fortnight, are applied or dealt with in any way if the individual agreed:
  • for the amount to be so applied or dealt with; and
  • in return, for amounts covered by salary and wages etc for the individual for the fortnight to be reduced (including to nil).

If the regular payment period is longer than a fortnight, these payments are allocated to each fortnight on a reasonable basis. For example, if an employee is paid monthly, it would presumably be reasonable to multiply the monthly amount by 12 and then divide that amount by 26.

The effect of these rules is as follows:

  • If the employer pays the employee $1,500 or more in income per fortnight before tax, the JobKeeper Payment will assist the employer to continue operating by subsidising all or part of the employee’s income.
  • If the employer would otherwise pay the employee less than $1,500 in income per fortnight before tax, the employer must pay the employee, at a minimum, $1,500 per fortnight before tax using the JobKeeper Payment.
  • If the employee has been stood down, the employer must pay the employee, at a minimum, $1,500 per fortnight before tax using the JobKeeper Payment.
Sole traders, partners, etc

There are special rules that enable sole traders (entities that do not have employees as such) to obtain the JobKeeper Payment. The statutory rules refer to such entities as “business participants”.

The ATO states that sole traders and some other entities (such as partnerships, trusts or companies) may be entitled to the JobKeeper Payment scheme under what is termed the “business participation entitlement”. However, not-for-profit organisations are not included.

The entity may be eligible for the JobKeeper Payment scheme if it has a non-employee individual – an “eligible business participant” – who is actively engaged in the operation of the business. The entity must meet all other relevant requirements.

The ATO makes the important point that officially under the scheme it is the entity – not the eligible business participant – which receives the JobKeeper Payment. However, this distinction is moot for a sole trader, who is both the business entity and an eligible business participant, and does receive the JobKeeper Payment themselves.

Eligible business participant

A non-employee individual is an eligible business participant of an entity for a JobKeeper fortnight if all of the following conditions are met; namely, that the individual:

  • is not employed by the entity;
  • is actively engaged in the business carried on by the entity (at 1 March 2020 and for the relevant JobKeeper fortnight);
  • is one of the following (again as at 1 March 2020 and for the individual fortnight):
  • a sole trader;
  • a partner in the partnership;
  • an adult beneficiary of the trust;
  • a shareholder or director in the company; and
  • as at 1 March 2020, was aged at least 16 and was an Australian resident (within the meaning of s 7 of the Social Security Act 1991), or a resident for income tax purposes and the holder of a special category (Subclass 444) visa;
  • is not receiving government parental leave pay or dad and partner pay; and
  • is not currently totally incapacitated for work and receiving payments under an Australian workers’ compensation law in respect of a total incapacity to work.

The ATO states that an eligible business participant cannot also be an employee (other than a casual employee) of another entity. If a sole trader is both a long-term casual employee of another business and an eligible sole trader, they can choose to either let their employer claim the JobKeeper Payments on their behalf or they can claim as a sole trader, but not both.

Importantly, only one eligible business participant can be nominated by an entity. This means that a business entity must choose which eligible business participant to nominate, and that entity is only entitled to one JobKeeper Payment per fortnight. This requirement does seem stringent when it comes to entities other than sole traders (eg partnerships or trusts).

The ATO has issued a JobKeeper Nomination Notice on its website. However, this should be not be used if an entity is intending to claim JobKeeper payments for an eligible business participant. Rather, a different nomination process will be required.

Eligible entities

An entity is eligible if it carried on a business in Australia as at 1 March 2020 and it satisfies the decline in turnover test for the relevant period.

In addition, it must have had an ABN as at 12 March 2020 and have lodged, on or before 12 March 2020:

  • a 2018–2019 income tax return showing that it had an amount included in its assessable income in relation to it carrying on a business, or
  • an activity statement or GST return for any tax period that started after 1 July 2018 and ended before 12 March 2020 showing that the entity made a taxable, GST-free or input-taxed sale.

The ATO has the discretion to allow an entity to obtain an ABN after 12 March 2020 where it was running an active business before 12 March 2020 but was not required to have an ABN to operate it.

An entity cannot claim JobKeeper Payments for an individual if there is already a JobKeeper claim being made by another business or employer for that individual.

Payment

The amount of an entity’s JobKeeper Payment for an individual for a fortnight is $1,500.

The statutory rules note that, for the avoidance of doubt, the fact that the ATO pays an entity a payment does not mean the entity is actually entitled to it, therefore ensuring the door to recovery is kept well open.

No payment will be made after 30 September 2021. Entitlement to a payment may be cancelled, revoked or varied by later legislation.

Superannuation

There are no changes to superannuation in the JobKeeper statutory rules, but the explanatory statement to the rules does flag that amendments will need to be made (through regulations made under the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992).

The regulations will ensure that an employer will only need to make superannuation contributions for any amount payable to an employee in respect of their actual employment, disregarding any extra payments made by the employer to satisfy the wage condition for getting the JobKeeper Payment.

For example, if the work actually done by an employee over a period entitled them to be paid $1,000 but the employer instead paid them $1,500 to satisfy the wage condition for a JobKeeper fortnight, then the employer will only be required to make superannuation contributions in relation to $1,000. Similarly, any liability to superannuation guarantee charge that the employer would have for not making sufficient superannuation contributions would be calculated by reference to that $1,000 base.

An employer will still be required to make the same superannuation contributions for an employee whose pay exceeds the JobKeeper Payment. For example, if an employee is entitled to be paid $2,000 for their work, the employer will continue to be required to make contributions in relation to that amount, irrespective of whether they were eligible to receive the JobKeeper Payment in relation to the employee.

Transitional rules

There is a transitional rule that allows the ATO to make an “advance payment” for the JobKeeper fortnights ending in the month of April without being satisfied that the entity is entitled to that payment. This was necessary to ensure that payments in respect of the first and second JobKeeper fortnights (starting on 30 March 2020 and 13 April 2020 respectively) could be made quickly to assist entities affected by the pandemic. Otherwise, entitlement only arises for those JobKeeper fortnights and later fortnights in which eligible employers are registered under the scheme before the end of a JobKeeper fortnight.

However, before the ATO can make an advance payment under the transitional rule:

  • the entity must have notified the ATO in the approved form of its election to participate in the scheme; and
  • the ATO must be satisfied, on the basis of the information the entity provides, that it is reasonable in the circumstances to make the payment.

Generally, an employer must notify the ATO in the approved form of its election to participate in the scheme before the employer can be entitled to a payment for a fortnight. This election generally needs to be provided to the ATO before the end of a JobKeeper fortnight for the employer to be entitled to a payment for that fortnight.

However, there is a different timing rule where the employer wishes to participate in the scheme and receive the first or second JobKeeper Payments. Where this is the case, the employer has until the end of the second JobKeeper fortnight, that is, 26 April 2020, to provide the ATO with its election to participate. This gives employers more time to comply with the election requirement and means that fewer employers will miss out on receiving the first JobKeeper payment (given that generally the scheme only applies prospectively to elections to participate).

The ATO points out that to qualify for the first JobKeeper Payment (to be received in May), eligible entities can make one combined payment of $3,000 for the first two fortnights, paid by end of April 2020. It is worth remembering that salary and wages operates on a cash basis; that is, the amount has to be received by the employee. The employer cannot accrue the liability and then pay it to the employee after receiving the JobKeeper Payment.

Integrity issues

Businesses, individuals and entities that deliberately enter into contrived arrangements with the sole or dominant purpose of reducing their turnover in order to gain access to or increase their JobKeeper Payments will not be entitled to the payment or the increased payment. The general interest charge (GIC) will apply on any overpayment under s 19 of the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020. In addition, significant administrative and criminal penalties may apply.

Records

An entity is not entitled to a JobKeeper Payment (or any other coronavirus economic response payment) unless it satisfies various pre-payment and post-payment record-keeping requirements. Relevant records must be in English, or readily accessible and easily convertible into English, and must be kept for five years after the payment is made.

Review of decisions

Various decisions of the ATO in relation to the JobKeeper Payment (and any other coronavirus economic response payments) – for example, that an entity is not entitled to a payment for a period or in relation to the amount of a payment – are subject to the objection and appeal provisions in Pt IV of the Taxation Administration Act 1953.

Tax consequences

The statutory rules do not state that a JobKeeper Payment is exempt income or non-assessable non-exempt (NANE) income. The payment will therefore be assessable as a subsidy. However, as a payment forms part of wages paid to the employee, a deduction for the payment is available under s 8-1 of ITAA 1997.

GST does not apply in relation to JobKeeper Payments made to employers, because the payments are not consideration for supplies made by employers to the government.

Source: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2020L00419; www.ato.gov.au/Business/Business-bulletins-newsroom/Employer-information/JobKeeper-Payment-is-here/.

ATO opens applications for early release of super

The ATO has released its application form for the early release of superannuation by individuals impacted by COVID-19. From 20 April, an individual can make one application to access up to $10,000 (tax-free) in the 2019–2020 financial year (ie they must make the application by 30 June 2020). A second application for up to $10,000 can be made in the 2020–2021 year (ie from 1 July 2020) until 24 September 2020.

An application can be made by:

  • the member authenticating themselves through the myGov website and completing the application form in ATO Online; or
  • for those who are unable to access online services, the individual calling the ATO, confirming their identity and completing the application over the phone.

The application form requires the person to certify that they are eligible and includes information about the consequences of making false applications. The individual will then proceed to:

  • review a list of open accounts they have and the last account balance reported for each account (in most cases at 30 June 2019);
  • input the amount they would like to release from each account – the total amount cannot exceed $10,000, but there are otherwise no limitations on what the individual can input;
  • input the details of the bank account (account name, BSB and number) they would like the money paid into; and
  • authorise the ATO to provide the information to the super fund and the super fund to release the money into that account.

The ATO has run a social media campaign asking people to observe the intention of the legislation and only apply to release their super to deal with the adverse economic effects of COVID-19. For example, the ATO says taxpayers should not withdraw their super early and recontribute it to gain a personal tax deduction.

Individuals have been able to login into myGov and register interest in the coronavirus early release of super measure with the ATO. The ATO has been contacting these individuals via SMS or email now that the application form is available to complete. As at 2 April 2020, 361,000 individuals had registered an interest in the measure.

Eligible individuals should carefully check their super account balances to ensure there are sufficient funds available to claim. If a member makes an application and the fund has insufficient money to fulfil the application, the ATO says the member will not be able to make a second application for the balance from another fund/account in that financial year. They will also not able to seek the balance in the 2020–2021 financial year above the $10,000 cap.

If an application is rejected by the ATO, the member will be notified via their MyGov account in two to three days.

Notification process for super funds

It will take one to two business days for super funds to receive notifications directly from the ATO about their members, with funds expecting to start receiving notifications from 21 April 2020. The ATO will be providing the details to funds in an electronic data file that funds will need to download via the Bulk Data Exchange (BDE) channel and process. The government expects funds to process the payments and release the amounts to individuals “as soon as possible”. The current process for existing categories of compassionate release of super will continue as is.

The ATO and the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) have confirmed that super funds will be able to rely on the ATO’s customer verification under a proposed anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regime rule.

Separate arrangements will apply for applications by members of self managed super funds (SMSFs). The ATO will issue a determination to the member (instead of the super fund) advising of their eligibility to release an amount. When the SMSF receives the determination from the member, the SMSF trustee is then authorised to make the payment.

Unclaimed super payment deferral

The ATO will grant super funds a deferral of the scheduled statement day and payment day for 31 December unclaimed money day accounts. The 30 April 2020 due date will be deferred to 31 October 2020.

The ATO is providing this deferral to allow funds to focus on assisting members who may be looking to release amounts from their super under the coronavirus condition for early release. The deferral extends the period within which unclaimed superannuation money (USM) accounts can be reported and paid. Any fund wanting to continue with their USM reporting as planned can do so. Funds may want to consider continuing reporting and paying USM for certain categories (such as where a member is 65 years or older) where it would be in the member’s interests. The ATO said it will not proceed with hyper-care arrangements for this USM period (including proactive consolidation).

Electronic release authority statements

During the COVID-19 period, the ATO says it will allow super funds to submit electronically release authority statements (RASs) and end benefit notices (EBNs) in relation to the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme and excess contributions, and for Div 293 purposes.

Super accounts available for release

A member can request amounts up to a total of $10,000 from multiple funds at the application stage, as follows:

  • The available fund accounts (excluding those in retirement phase) will be displayed via myGov and the member can choose multiple accounts and the amount to be approved for release from each account.
  • There are no restrictions on the amount a person can request for release from any account, except the $10,000 overall yearly limit.
  • A member can request more than the account balance displayed to them in the application.
  • There is a limit of $10,000 in the one application per financial year.

A member cannot add a new fund to myGov when applying; only matched accounts reported to the ATO through the Member Account Attribute Service (MAAS) will be displayed.

The application form will display all open accounts except those in retirement phase. A member can only apply for one determination per financial year. For example, a member can request $1,000 from one fund and another $9,000 from another fund as long as they do so in the same application. Members will not be able to make a subsequent application if they do not request or receive the full amount approved in their first application for that financial year.

Proportioning rule

While a released amount is non-assessable non-exempt income (NANE) for the individual, the ATO notes that the payment is subject to the proportioning rule in s 307-125 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). Therefore, individuals with multiple super accounts still need to consider the underlying tax components of their different super interests when choosing which accounts to release from.

Generally, a taxpayer with multiple super interests should consider nominating the release amount to be paid from the interest with the largest taxable component. However, take care if looking to maintain an unrestricted non-preserved component, as any benefit payment from a particular super interest will be cashed out first from the unrestricted non-preserved component.

For accounts where a member’s tax-free component is actually higher than the entire accumulation balance itself (as a result of negative returns), it may be helpful to maintain some of that interest in the accumulation phase so that it can be used to absorb any future investment earnings (which would otherwise be effectively added to the taxable component). However, there is no one-size-fits-all approach, so it is necessary to consider the operation of the proportioning rule on the future payment of benefits for a member’s particular circumstances.

Pension accounts

The ATO notes that super amounts cannot be released from a pension account under the coronavirus early access condition of release.

The recent amendments to allow early access to super under the coronavirus condition of release do not vary the circumstances in which pension payments may be made from a transition to retirement income stream (TRIS), or the circumstances in which an amount commuted from a TRIS can be cashed out of the superannuation fund. Hence, the ATO says no amounts in excess of what is already allowed to be cashed from a TRIS can be released under the coronavirus condition.

However, a member whose TRIS comprises preserved or restricted non-preserved benefits may be able to commute the TRIS back to the accumulation phase within the superannuation fund (in accordance with the rules of the fund and the pension). In this case, the ATO says the preserved and restricted non-preserved amounts may then be eligible to be released under the coronavirus condition for early release. As an individual can only apply once in each financial year, it is important to first commute a pension amount back to accumulation before applying to the ATO.

Payment by fund

Funds are required to make the payment tax-free “as soon as practicable”. The ATO acknowledges that there may be occasions when a fund will need to contact the member to meet that obligation. In those scenarios, a fund can use the ATO’s provision of details (POD) service to obtain current contact details for a member.

Funds are not required to issue PAYG statements showing a proportion of the payment to be taxable component – untaxed element. The payment is not a “withholding payment” and an amount is not required to be withheld from the payment as it is NANE (s 12-1(1A) of Sch 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953). There is no requirement to report back to the ATO where a fund is unable to pay part or all of the money requested under the early release provisions.

The ATO will makes determinations based on self-assessment, but if a fund identifies a case suspected to be at high risk of fraud, it should be reported to the ATO for confirmation of the best approach to manage it. Any compliance activity will be followed up by the ATO directly with the individual.

Non-regulated funds and defined benefit funds

Members of non-regulated funds will need to apply directly to their own scheme/fund for early release of super. If an individual applies to the ATO for the release of an amount from an exempt public sector superannuation scheme (EPSSS), the ATO will process the application, make a determination and send a notification to the EPSSS. It will be up to the EPSSS to decide how to respond to the notification and what action to take.

When an individual applies, they will be presented with all open accounts that are not in retirement phase. This will include defined benefit accounts. The ATO will process the application and notify the defined benefit fund. It is up to the defined benefit fund to decide whether or not to release the amount. As an individual can only apply once in each financial year, it is important to first check whether a defined benefit fund can or will release amounts before applying to the ATO.

ATO-held super

An individual cannot apply for a determination to release super amount held by the ATO. If the individual is not eligible for a direct payment of ATO-held super, they will need to request a transfer of the ATO-held super into an account held by a super provider on their behalf before requesting its release.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Super/APRA-regulated-funds/In-detail/News/CRT-Alerts/2020/CRT-Alert-004/2020—COVID-19-economic-response-package—early-release-of-super/.

 

This article contains information on developments up to and including 17 April 2020.

Client Alert – April 2020

Coronavirus cash flow boost payments explained

As of the second round of economic stimulus in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian Government has legislated a measure to boost cash flow for employers. However, small to medium employers who intend to claim the “cash flow boost payment” in the hope of receiving an injection of cash should beware. The “payment” is not actually a payment, but a credit that will be offset against the liabilities that appear on the business activity statement (BAS) and any debits in your running balance account (RBA). While this is still likely to support employment by reducing the amount some businesses have to pay to the ATO, anyone hoping to get a cash injection will be sorely disappointed.

Eligible employers will receive an offset equal to three times the amount of tax withheld from ordinary salary and wages as disclosed in the March monthly BAS, or equal to the amount of tax withheld from ordinary salary and wages for the quarter. Both are subject to a minimum of $10,000 and a maximum of $50,000. The payment is due on 28 April 2020 and other payments will follow later this year.

These cash flow boost payments are only available to entities that qualified as small or medium entities (ie with turnover less than $50 million) for the income year most recently assessed. There is also a withholding requirement – the payment will only be made to entities that first notify the ATO that they have a withholding obligation through the lodgment of a BAS or an instalment activity statement (IAS) for the period.

Understanding the JobKeeper Payment scheme

The JobKeeper Payment scheme is now open to eligible employers, sole traders and other entities to enable them to pay their eligible employees’ salary or wages of at least $1,500 each (before tax) per fortnight. You can enrol for the JobKeeper Payment through the ATO’s Business Portal, in ATO online services using myGov if you are a sole trader, or through a registered tax or BAS agent.

There are special rules that enable sole traders (entities that do not have employees as such) to obtain the JobKeeper Payment.

The JobKeeper Payment scheme commenced on 30 March and will finish on 27 September 2020, operating on a fortnightly basis. Employers and eligible recipients must qualify on a (rolling) fortnightly basis.

Decline in turnover

Businesses (including sole traders and charities) must have suffered a “substantial decline” in turnover due to the COVID-19 pandemic to be entitled to the payment of $1,500 for each eligible employee.

The decline in turnover test requires you to measure the business’s projected GST turnover and compare it to a “relevant comparison period”. To be eligible, the turnover must have declined by:

  • for ACNC-registered charities: 15%;
  • for entities with turnover less than $1 billion: 30%;
  • for entities with turnover greater than $1 billion: 50%.
Wage condition

Critically, it is a condition of entitlement that the business has paid salary and wages of at least the amount of $1,500 (before tax) to each relevant employee in the fortnight.

Employee conditions

An individual must be employed during a JobKeeper fortnight to be eligible for that fortnight (but does not need to be employed for the full fortnight). In addition, they must, as at 1 March 2020, be aged 16 or over, be an employee or a long-term casual employee (12 months of regular and systematic employment) and be an Australia resident for tax purposes.

The 1 March date is important, as it allows employees who were retrenched after that date but then subsequently rehired to be eligible for the JobKeeper Payment. However, if an employee was only engaged after 1 March, they are not eligible.

Eligible employees must have provided a notice to their employer agreeing:

  • to be nominated by the employer as an eligible employee of that employer under the JobKeeper scheme;
  • that they have not agreed to be nominated by another employer; and
  • that (if employed as a casual employee) they do not have permanent employment with another employer.

An eligible employee who is employed by one or more qualifying employers will need to choose one employer that will receive the JobKeeper Payments.

Once an employee has nominated an employer, the employer has received JobKeeper Payments and has paid the employee, the employee cannot nominate a different employer. This includes where the employment relationship ends (although the ex-employee may then be eligible for the separate JobSeeker Payment).

Payment

The government will pay the JobKeeper Payment within 14 days of the end of the calendar month in which the fortnight ends. This means that the first JobKeeper Payment will not be made until (at least) the first week of May.

ATO opens applications for early release of super

The ATO has released its application form for the early release of superannuation by individuals impacted by COVID-19. From 20 April, an individual can make one application to access up to $10,000 of their super (tax-free) in the 2019–2020 financial year, and a second application for up to $10,000 in the 2020–2021 year until 24 September 2020.

If you are eligible, you should carefully check your super account balances to ensure there are sufficient funds available to claim. If you make an application and the fund has insufficient money to fulfil the application, you will not be able to make a second application for the balance from another fund/account in that financial year or ask for an amount above the $10,000 cap in the 2020–2021 financial year.

It take one to two business days for super funds to receive notifications directly from the ATO about their members. The government then expects funds to process the payments and release the amounts to individuals “as soon as possible”.

If your application is rejected by the ATO, you will be notified via your MyGov account in two to three days.

Separate arrangements apply for applications by members of self managed super funds (SMSFs). The ATO will issue a determination to you as the fund member (instead of to the super fund) advising of your eligibility to release an amount. When the SMSF receives the determination from you, the SMSF trustee is then authorised to make the payment.

This article contains information on developments up to and including 17 April 2020.

Do you or your business need help?

If you or your business need help with your financial arrangements during this difficult time, we can help you to work out which of the many coronavirus (COVID-19) related payments, concessions and arrangements apply to you, and how you can best make use of them. Contact us today.

Explanatory Memorandum – March 2020

Super guarantee loophole closed

A superannuation guarantee loophole that allowed employers to use salary sacrificed contributions to make up part of their required super guarantee contributions has been closed. From 1 January 2020, employers must make the full amount of mandatory super guarantee contributions and cannot use salary-sacrificed amounts to reduce those mandatory contributions. Depending on the types of employment agreements between employees and employers, this could mean more money for employees’ retirement.

The concept of super guarantee – the requirement for employers to contribute 9.5% of an employee’s salary or wages into a nominated super account – should be familiar to everyone, particularly anyone who is an employee, as it makes up the bulk of future retirement income. Employees may also be salary-sacrificing amounts of their salary and wages to put extra into their super.

Before this year, a loophole in the law meant that an employee’s salary-sacrificed amounts could be counted towards employer contribution amounts. This allowed a potential reduction in employers mandated super guarantee contributions – essentially working against the employee’s intention to add extra to their super. In addition, employers were able to calculate their super guarantee obligations on the lower, post-sacrifice earnings base.

Depending on the type of employment agreement between an employee and employer, this meant that if the employee salary-sacrificed an amount equal to or more than the super guarantee amount the employer was required to pay, the employer could have chosen to not contribute any non-sacrifice amount and the legal requirements of the super guarantee would still be met. It’s important to note that this was not the original intention of the law, and not all employers would make the choice to exploit this loophole; however, where they did, employees who salary-sacrificed could be short-changed and end up with lower super contributions as well as a lower salary overall.

The law has now been changed specifically to close this loophole. From 1 January 2020, amounts that an employee salary-sacrifices to superannuation cannot be used to reduce the employer’s super guarantee charge, and do not form part of any late contributions the employer makes that are eligible for offset against the super guarantee charge. To avoid any possible shortfall in their mandatory super guarantee contribution payments, employers must now contribute at least 9.5% of an employee’s ordinary time earnings (OTE) base to a complying super fund. The OTE base consists of the employee’s OTE and any amounts they sacrifice into superannuation that would have been OTE if the salary-sacrifice arrangement wasn’t in place.

The following simple example illustrates the effect of the old law versus the new law for an employee with an OTE base of $15,000.

Old law New law
Employee’s OTE $15,000 $15,000
Super guarantee entitlement ($15,000 × 9.5%) $1,425 $1,425
Salary-sacrifice contribution $1,000 $1,000
Minimum compliant employer contribution $425 $1,425
Total super contributions
(including salary-sacrificed amount)
$1,425 $2,425

Source: Treasury Laws Amendment (2019 Tax Integrity and Other Measures No 1) Act 2019.

ATO tackling international tax evasion

Australian tax residents are taxed in Australia on their worldwide income. While most do the right thing and declare all their income, some try to avoid paying tax by exploiting secrecy provisions and the lack of information-sharing between countries. As the world becomes more interconnected and barriers are broken down, it is inevitable that there are fewer places for the unscrupulous to hide from tax.

With the rise of the global economy and easy flow of money across borders, no country is immune to international tax evasion and money laundering. A recent coordinated effort with Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement (J5) shows that member countries, including Australia, are doing all they can to protect their tax revenue. This most recent investigation yielded evidence of tax evasion by Australians using an international institution located in Central America.

Tax chiefs from the J5 countries met in Sydney on 17–21 February 2020 to share information about common mechanisms, enablers and structures that are being exploited to commit transnational tax crime. The J5 was initially formed in 2018 to fight global tax evasion and consists of the tax and revenue agencies of Australia, United Kingdom, United States, Canada and the Netherlands. The countries share intelligence on international tax crime as well as money laundering.

The current international investigation started on information obtained by the Netherlands, which led to a series of investigations in multiple countries and concerned an international financial institution located in Central America whose products and services are believed to be facilitating money laundering and tax evasion for customers across the globe.

J5 members believe that through this institution, a number of clients may be using a sophisticated system to conceal and transfer wealth anonymously to evade their tax obligations and launder the proceeds of crime. The enforcement action consisted of evidence, intelligence and information-collecting activities such as search warrants, interviews and subpoenas.

According to the ATO, several hundred Australians are suspected of participating in these arrangements. The ATO is currently proceeding with multiple investigations with support from the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC). In addition, it is encouraging anyone with information about the scheme or other similar arrangements to contact the ATO.

ATO Deputy Commissioner and Australia’s J5 Chief, Will Day, has said, “this multi-agency, multi-country activity should degrade the confidence of anyone who was considering an offshore location as a way to evade tax or launder the proceeds of crime”.

While the J5 is a powerful tool, it is by no means the only one in the ATO’s arsenal. The ATO also has a network of international tax treaties and information exchange agreements with over 100 jurisdictions, and uses them to identify facilitators such as banks, lawyers and financial advisers. Once a pattern has been identified, such as a practitioner with a large number of clients using the same methods to avoid or evade tax, the ATO is likely to look closely at the entire client base.

In recent years over 2,500 exchanges of information have occurred, enabling the ATO to raise additional tax liabilities of $1 billion. The message from the ATO is that anyone with offshore income or assets is better off declaring their interests voluntarily. Those who do so may have administrative penalties and interest charges reduced.

It’s important to keep in mind that holding offshore assets is not just for the wealthy. Australians with migrant backgrounds may not even know they hold offshore assets in some cases, but those assets are still subject to tax law. For example, grandparents or other relatives may start a bank account in an Australian’s name in another country to make contributions celebrating a holiday, birthday or other life event.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Media-centre/Media-releases/Global-tax-chiefs-undertake-unprecedented-multi-country-day-of-action-to-tackle-international-tax-evasion/.

New measures to combat illegal phoenixing

New laws are now in place to target illegal phoenixing of companies, which by some estimates costs businesses, employees and governments more than $2 billion a year.

While there is no Australian legislative definition of “illegal phoenixing” or “phoenixing activity”, at its core it is understood as the use of serial deliberate insolvency as a business model to avoid paying company debts. To combat this, the new laws target a range of behaviours, including preventing property transfers to defeat creditors, improving accountability of resigning directors, allowing the ATO to collect estimates of anticipated GST liabilities and authorising the ATO to retain tax refunds.

Property transfer to defeat creditors

New criminal offences and civil penalty provisions will apply to company officers who fail to prevent the company from making “creditor-defeating dispositions”, and to other persons (including pre-insolvency advisers, accountants, lawyers and other business advisers) who facilitate a company making a “creditor-defeating disposition”. Liquidators and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) can seek to recover the assets for the company’s creditors, and in some cases creditors can recover compensation from a company’s officers and other persons responsible for making a “creditor-defeating disposition”.

A “creditor-defeating disposition” is defined as disposing of company property for less than its market value (or less than the best price reasonably obtainable) that has the effect of preventing, hindering or significantly delaying the property becoming available to meet the demands of the company’s creditors in winding-up. To ensure legitimate businesses aren’t affected by this wide definition, safe harbour has been maintained for genuine business restructures and transactions made with creditor or court approval under a deed of company arrangement.

Accountability of resigning directors

In order to reduce the instances of unscrupulous directors using loopholes to shift the blame, the new laws seek to prevent abandonment of companies by a resigning director or directors, leaving the company without a natural person’s oversight. Practically, under the new laws, a director cannot resign or be removed by a resolution of company members if doing so would leave the company without a director (unless the company is being wound up).

In addition, if the resignation of a director is reported to ASIC more than 28 days after the purported resignation, the resignation is deemed to take effect from the day it is reported to ASIC. However, a company or director may apply to ASIC or the Court to give effect to the resignation notwithstanding the delay in reporting the change to ASIC.

Collection of anticipated GST liabilities

Under the new laws, the ATO can now collect estimates of anticipated GST liabilities, including luxury car tax (LCT) and wine equalisation tax (WET) liabilities. The ATO can also recover director penalties from company directors to collect outstanding GST liabilities (including LCT and WET) and estimates of those liabilities.

Retaining refunds

The new laws also allow the ATO to retain a refund to a taxpayer where that taxpayer has other outstanding lodgements or needs to provide important information.

Source: Treasury Laws Amendment (Combating Illegal Phoenixing) Act 2019 (Cth).

Insurance payouts: are they taxable?

In recent months, parts of Australia have been battered by a combination of fire and floods. As people try to piece their lives together in the aftermath, insurance payouts can go a long way in helping rebuild homes and replace lost items. However, if you receive an insurance payout in relation to your business, home business or rental property you need to be aware there may be associated tax consequences.

For example, if you rent out your home or a portion of your home on a short stay website, you may be subject to capital gains tax (CGT) if you receive an insurance payout in relation to that home. Businesses that receive an insurance payment may be subject to varying tax consequences depending on what the payment is designed to replace.

Insurance payouts relating to personal property (including household items, furniture, electrical goods, private boats and cars) and your main residence are not taxed. If you keep a home office or run a business from home and you receive an insurance payout in relation to the property being damaged or destroyed, there may be CGT consequences.

Similarly, if you have a rental property or rented out a room of your main residence which later becomes damaged or destroyed and is subject to an insurance payout, you will need to include the insurance payout amount when you work out whether you have a capital gain or loss. This applies even if you were casually renting out a room, your home or (part of) your farm as short-stay accommodation.

For those operating a business, the tax consequences of an insurance payout are even more complicated depending on what the money received is for. For example, destroyed business premises come with CGT consequences, while any insurance amount you receive for repair of damage will need to be included in your assessable income.

If an amount is received in relation to damaged or destroyed trading stock, it must be included as assessable income. For any depreciating assets used in generating assessable income (eg office equipment), you will need to calculate the difference between the amount received from insurance and the asset book value of the asset at the time it was destroyed. Any excess needs to be included as assessable income, while a deduction can be claimed for any losses.

For depreciating assets in the low-value pool, you will need to reduce the closing pool balance by the amount of insurance payment you receive. In addition, the tax treatment will need to be modified if an asset was partly used to produce assessable income and in a low-value pool.

The tax treatment of insurance payments for work cars is similar to that of depreciating assets, except if you used the logbook method for claiming car expenses. If you used the logbook method, the balancing adjustment amount needs to be reduced by the percentage that you used the car for personal use.

Businesses that correctly informed their insurer of their GST status when they took out the insurance don’t have to pay GST on insurance payout amounts and may be entitled to GST credits for purchases made with those amounts. Small businesses may also be entitled to CGT concessions.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/individuals/dealing-with-disasters/damaged-or-destroyed-property/.

Australia’s independent tax complaints investigator

Do you know who to turn to when you have a complaint about the ATO? Whether you’re an individual or business, the Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman (IGTO) should be your first port of call. The department has two distinct, yet intertwined, functions.

As the Taxation Ombudsman, the IGTO provides all taxpayers with an independent complaints investigation service. One of the main roles of the IGTO is that it must investigate complaints by taxpayers (or their representatives) where a tax official’s actions or inactions, decisions or systems have affected them personally. As the Inspector-General of Taxation, it also conducts reviews and provides independent advice and recommendations to government, ATO and other departments.

The difference between the two functions is that the Taxation Ombudsman’s investigations and recommendations are likely to be made privately, whereas when the office conducts reviews (not in response to a complaint) as the Inspector-General of Taxation, the investigations and recommendations are public and aimed at improving administration of the tax law.

In the first quarter of 2019–2020 the IGTO received 909 complaints – a 14% increase over the number for the same period in 2018–2019. Of the complaints received so far this year, 82.4% of the complaints received were from self-represented individuals, of whom approximately 10-12% were small business taxpayers. Taxpayers who had a representative were largely represented by a family member or friend, although around a third were represented by an accountant or a tax practitioner.

The top five issues raised in complaints for the quarter remain largely the same as the previous year, covering debt collection, payments to the taxpayer, lodgement and processing, communication, and audit and review. According to the IGTO, issues surrounding debt collection have featured consistently among the complaints lodged since the assumption of the Tax Ombudsman service.

While the IGTO has direct access to ATO officers, records and systems, it cannot investigate how much tax needs to be paid, provide advice regarding structure of tax affairs or assist with decisions made by other government agencies apart from the Tax Practitioners Board. The IGTO can investigate and assist taxpayers with issues including:

  • extensions of time to pay;
  • the ATO’s debt recovery action;
  • delays with processing tax returns;
  • delays in ATO communication and responses;
  • information the ATO has considered regarding taxpayers’ matters;
  • understanding the ATO’s actions and decisions; and
  • identifying available options and other relevant agencies that can help.

Taxpayers can approach the IGTO at any stage of their dispute with the ATO, although it is recommended that they first approach the ATO officer/manager assigned to their case, followed by the ATO complaints section, before lodging a formal IGTO complaint.

Complaints can be made online and via phone or post, and services are offered in languages other than English as well as for people who are hearing, sight or speech impaired. The IGTO will require:

  • basic personal information including the taxpayer’s tax file number (TFN);
  • the main facts, relevant dates and supporting documents;
  • an explanation of how ATO actions have caused concern and how those actions have affected the taxpayer; and
  • information about what the taxpayer or their representative has done to try to resolve the complaint, the result to date, and the desired outcome from the complaint.

Source: www.igt.gov.au/.

ATO scrutiny on car parking fringe benefits

The ATO has started contacting certain employers that provide car parking fringe benefits to their employees to ensure that all fringe benefits tax (FBT) obligations are being met. Generally, car parking fringe benefits arise where the car is:

  • parked on the business premises of the entity providing the benefit;
  • used by the employee to travel between home and their primary place of employment and is parked in the vicinity of that employment;
  • parked for periods totalling more than four hours between 7 am and 7 pm; and
  • a commercial parking station located within 1 km of the premises charges more than the car parking threshold amount.

Employers that meet these conditions are providing parking benefits and have a choice of three methods to calculate the taxable value of the benefits: the commercial parking station method, the average cost method and the market value method.

The method currently under ATO scrutiny is the market value method, which states that the taxable value of a car parking benefit is the amount that the recipient could reasonably be expected to have to pay if the provider and the recipient were dealing with each other under arm’s length conditions. When using this method, the employer must obtain a valuation report from an independent valuer who has expertise in the valuation of car parking facilities and is at arm’s length from the employer.

At a minimum, the ATO requires a valuation report to be in English and to detail the following:

  • the date of valuation;
  • a precise description of the location of the car parking facilities valued;
  • the number of car parking spaces valued;
  • the value of the car parking spaces based on a daily rate;
  • the full name of the valuer and their qualifications;
  • the valuer’s signature; and
  • a declaration stating the valuer is at arm’s length from the valuation.

In addition to the valuation report, an employer also needs a declaration relating to each FBT year that includes the number of car parking spaces available to be used by employees, the number of business days, and the daily value of the car parking spaces.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Tax-professionals/Newsroom/Your-practice/Valuing-car-parking-fringe-benefits/.

Foreign residents and the main residence exemption

Laws limiting foreign residents’ ability to claim the capital gains tax (CGT) main residence exemption are now in place. This means that if you’re a foreign resident at the time of disposal of the property that was your main residence, you may not be entitled to an exemption and may be liable for tens of thousands in CGT. Some limited exemptions apply for “life events”, as well as property purchased before 9 May 2017 and disposed of before 30 June 2020.

The restrictions apply to any person who is not an Australian resident for tax purposes at the time of disposal (ie when the contract is signed to sell the property).

According to the ATO, a person’s residency status in earlier income years will not be relevant and there will be no partial CGT main residence exemption. Therefore, not only are current foreign residents affected, but current Australian residents who are thinking of spending extended periods overseas for work or other purposes may also need to factor in this change to any plans related to selling a main residence while overseas.

For current foreign residents, there may still be time to act. You can still claim the CGT main residence exemption if, when the CGT event happens to your property, you were a foreign resident for tax purposes for a continuous period of six years or less and during that time one of the following “life events” happened:

  • you, your spouse, or your child under 18 had a terminal medical condition;
  • your spouse or your child under 18 died; or
  • the CGT event involved the distribution of assets between you and your spouse as a result of your divorce, separation or similar maintenance agreement.

Further, if you purchased your main residence before 7:30 pm (AEST) on 9 May 2017, you may still be entitled to the exemption provided you sell your home on or before 30 June 2020, subject to satisfying other existing requirements for the exemption. If you miss the 30 June window for disposal of the property in 2020, you will not be entitled to the main residence exemption unless one of the listed “life events” occurs within a continuous period of six years of becoming a foreign resident.

Similarly, for properties acquired at or after 7:30 pm (AEST) on 9 May 2017, the CGT main residence exemption will not apply to disposals from that date unless certain “life events” occur within a continuous period of six years of the individual becoming a foreign resident.

It’s important to note that these changes apply even if you die – if you’re a foreign resident for tax purposes at the time of your death, the same foreign resident restrictions will apply to your legal personal representatives, the trustees and beneficiaries of deceased estates, any surviving joint tenants and special disability trusts.

Since this law change is retrospective, the ATO requires foreign residents who acquired property at or after 7:30 pm (AEST) on 9 May 2017 to review their positions back to the 2016–2017 income year and seek tax return amendments where necessary. Foreign residents who purchased their property before 7:30 pm (AEST) on 9 May 2017 and who then dispose of their property after 30 June 2020 will only need to review their positions to the 2020–2021 income year.

The ATO has said it will not apply shortfall penalties and any interest accrued will be remitted to the base interest rate up to the date of enactment of the law change. Additionally, any interest in excess of the base rate accruing after the date of enactment will be remitted where taxpayers actively seek to amend their assessments within a reasonable timeframe of the law cming into force.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/general/capital-gains-tax/international-issues/Foreign-residents-and-main-residence-exemption/.

 

Client Alert – March 2020

Super guarantee loopholes closed

The concept of a superannuation guarantee – the legal requirement for your employer to contribute 9.5% of your salary into a nominated super account – should be familiar to everyone, as it makes up the bulk of most people’s future retirement income. You may also salary-sacrifice amounts of your salary to put extra into your super.

Until recently, loopholes in the law meant that your employer could count your salary-sacrificed amounts towards their super guarantee contribution amounts – essentially working against your intention to boost your super. Employers could also calculate their super guarantee obligations based on your post-sacrifice earnings rather than on your full pre-sacrifice earnings.

Depending on your employment agreement, these loopholes meant that if you salary-sacrificed an amount equal to or more than your employer’s super guarantee amount, your employer could choose to not contribute any amount and the legal requirements of the super guarantee would still be met.

The good news is that the law has now been changed. From 1 January 2020, amounts that you salary-sacrifice to super can’t be used to reduce your employer’s super guarantee obligations, and employers must calculate their super guarantee obligations based on all of your ordinary time earnings (OTE), including any amounts you sacrifice into superannuation that would have otherwise been OTE.

ATO tackling international tax evasion

Australian tax residents are taxed in Australia on their worldwide income. While most do the right thing and declare all their income, some people and businesses try to avoid paying tax by exploiting secrecy provisions and information-sharing gaps between countries.

A recent coordinated effort by the Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement (J5) has yielded evidence of tax evasion by Australians. The J5 consists of the tax and revenue agencies of Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and the Netherlands and was initially formed in 2018 to fight global tax evasion. The countries share intelligence on international tax crime as well as money laundering.

According to the ATO, several hundred Australians are suspected of participating in arrangements with an international financial institution in Central America whose products and services are believed to be facilitating worldwide money laundering and tax evasion. Multiple investigations are currently under way, and anyone with information about the scheme or other similar arrangements is encouraged to contact the ATO.

The ATO has a network of international tax treaties and information exchange agreements with over 100 jurisdictions. In recent years over 2,500 exchanges of information have occurred, enabling the ATO to identify unpaid tax amounts totalling $1 billion.

New measures to combat illegal phoenixing

New laws are now in place to target illegal phoenixing of companies in Australia.

Phoenix activity is when a new company is created – “rising from the ashes” of another company that was in debt and has been deliberately liquidated – to continue the business of the old company while avoiding having to pay its debts. Recent estimates are that illegal phoenix activity directly costs Australian businesses, employees and governments between $2.85 billion and $5.13 billion each year.

To combat this type of debt and tax evasion, the new laws target a range of behaviours, including preventing property transfers to defeat creditors, improving the accountability requirements for resigning company directors, allowing the ATO to collect estimates of anticipated GST liabilities and authorising the ATO to retain tax refunds where lodgements are outstanding.

Insurance payouts: are they taxable?

In recent months, parts of Australia have been battered by a combination of fire and floods. As people try to piece their lives together in the aftermath, insurance payouts can go a long way in helping rebuild homes and replace lost items.

However, if you receive an insurance payout in relation to your business, home business or rental property you need to be aware there may be associated tax consequences. For example, if you keep a home office or run a business from home, or make money from renting out your home on a short-stay website, you may be subject to capital gains tax (CGT) when receiving an insurance payout on the home.

Businesses that receive an insurance payment may be subject to varying tax consequences depending on what the payment is designed to replace.

Australia’s independent tax complaints investigator

Do you know who to turn to when you have a complaint about the ATO? Whether you’re an individual or business, the Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman (IGTO) should be your first port of call.

As the Taxation Ombudsman, the IGTO provides all taxpayers with an independent complaints investigation service. As the Inspector-General of Taxation, it also conducts reviews and provides independent advice and recommendations to government, ATO and other departments.

The IGTO can investigate and assist with issues including extensions of time to pay; the ATO’s debt recovery actions; delays with processing tax returns; delays in ATO communication and responses; information the ATO has considered regarding taxpayers’ matters; understanding the ATO’s actions and decisions; and identifying available options and other relevant agencies that can help.

Complaints can be made online and via phone or post, and services are offered in languages other than English as well as for people who are hearing, sight or speech impaired.

ATO scrutiny on car parking fringe benefits

The ATO has started contacting certain employers that provide car parking fringe benefits to their employees to ensure that all fringe benefits tax (FBT) obligations are being met. Generally, car parking fringe benefits arise where the car is parked on the business premises of the entity, used by the employee to travel between home and their primary place of employment and is parked for more than four hours between 7 am and 7 pm, and where a commercial parking station located within 1 km of the premises charges more than the car parking threshold amount.

Employers have a choice of three methods to calculate the taxable value of the benefits: the commercial parking station method, the average cost method and the market value method. The method currently under ATO scrutiny is the market value method, which states that the taxable value of a car parking benefit is the amount that the recipient could reasonably be expected to have to pay if the provider and the recipient were dealing with each other under arm’s length conditions.

Foreign residents and the main residence exemption

Laws limiting foreign residents’ ability to claim the CGT main residence exemption are now in place. This means that if you’re a foreign resident for tax purposes at the time you sign a contract to sell a property that was your main residence, you may be liable for tens of thousands of dollars in CGT. Some limited exemptions apply for “life events”, as well as property purchased before 9 May 2017 and disposed of before 30 June 2020.

According to the ATO, a person’s residency status in earlier income years will not be relevant and there will be no partial CGT main residence exemption. Therefore, not only are current foreign residents affected, but current Australian residents who are thinking of spending extended periods overseas for work or other purposes may also need to factor in this change to any plans related to selling a main residence while overseas.

 

Explanatory Memorandum – February 2020

ATO backs down from controversial time limit ruling

In 2018, the ATO issued a controversial draft ruling which took a very strict stance on the four-year time limit for claiming input tax credits and fuel tax credits. The ruling had been used by the ATO to deny input tax credits and fuel tax credits where the Commissioner makes a decision on an objection or amendment request outside the four-year period. However, a recent observation by a judge ruling on a related matter has put the ATO’s strict stance in doubt and as a result, the ruling has been withdrawn.

The ATO has recently withdrawn Draft Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2018/D1 on the time limit for claiming input tax credits and fuel tax credits. Generally, under s 93-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), the right to claim an input tax credit expires after four years and commences on the day on which the entity was required to lodge a return for the tax period to which the input tax credit would be attributable. Section 47-5 of the Fuel Tax Act 2006 has a similar provision which limits claims to four years after the date on which taxpayers were required to give the ATO a return.

The withdrawn draft ruling created much controversy for its strict stance on the four-year time limit rules for claiming the credits. It stated that a tax credit would not be taken into account in an assessment when the taxpayer lodges an objection or requests an amendment, even if the objection or amendment request is made within the four-year entitlement period. Therefore, the effect of the draft ruling was that if the ATO’s decision on an objection or amendment request was made outside the four-year period (but the request by the taxpayer was lodged within the four-year period), the taxpayer would not have been entitled to the tax credits even if the decision was favourable to the taxpayer.

After the draft was issued, however, the Federal Court did not quite agree with the ATO’s stance (Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1582). The Court accepted Coles’ submissions that s 47-5 of the Fuel Tax Act is only intended to prevent an ongoing entitlement to claim credits in a later return where a return has not been lodged or credits have not been claimed.

The Court noted that once a return has been lodged and objected to, there is no scope for the operation of s 47-5 to disentitle a taxpayer to fuel tax credits, because the rights of the Commissioner and taxpayer are protected by various sections of the Tax Administration Act 1953 (TAA).

In a decision impact statement following the judgment in the Coles case, the ATO acknowledged that the Court’s observations were contrary to its own views. Subsequently, it withdrew the ruling, conceding that the views expressed in MT 2018/D1 was no longer current. While the Coles decision only refers to fuel tax credits, given the similarity of the provisions between fuel tax credits and the GST Act, and the Court’s observations regarding the rights of the Commissioner and taxpayer being protected by the TAA, it stands to reason it would also apply to input tax credits. Thus, the ATO is planning to issue a new ruling in early 2020 that takes into account the Federal Court’s observations.

In the meantime, what this means for affected taxpayers is that, where the ATO makes a decision on an objection or a request for amendment in relation to input tax credits and/or fuel tax credits outside the four-year period (with the initial objection or amendment request lodged within the time limit), the taxpayer will no longer be automatically denied the credits in situations where the decision is favourable. As a result, any taxpayer that the draft ruling has affected (ie who has had input tax credits or fuel tax credits denied because objections or amendment decisions had been made outside the four-year time limit) is encouraged to contact the ATO.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/law/view/pdf/dis/dis_coles_supermarkets_australia.pdf.

ATO extends bushfire assistance: lodgements deferred

On 20 January 2020 the ATO announced an extension of the tax assistance package for people impacted by the 2019–2020 bushfires in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania.

Commissioner of Taxation Mr Chris Jordan said the 3.5 million businesses, individuals and self-managed super funds (SMSFs) in the impacted local government areas will have until 28 May 2020 to lodge and pay BASs and income tax returns. This additional time is on top of the two-month extension previously granted.

Additionally, the ATO said it will fast-track any refunds that are due to taxpayers in the impacted regions. For example, businesses expecting a refund as a result of GST credits due to large purchases to replace stock are encouraged to lodge their activity statements at the first opportunity. The ATO will also remit any interest and penalties applied to tax debts since the commencement of the bushfires. Mr Jordan said taxpayers or their agents in the affected areas do not need to apply for a deferral, a faster refund or remission of interest or penalties. This will be done by the ATO automatically (except for large PAYG withholders). Affected taxpayers are also able to vary their income tax instalments to nil without penalties. This also applies if taxpayers end up in a tax payable situation for that quarter once they have lodged their tax return.

For taxpayers with a tax debt or outstanding obligation, the ATO will not initiate debt recovery action until at least 28 May 2020. Taxpayers can also request payment arrangements for outstanding debts. The ATO will also consider releasing individuals and businesses from income tax and FBT debts if they are experiencing serious hardship. However, employers still need to meet their ongoing super guarantee (SG) obligations for their employees.

A complete list of the impacted areas is available on the ATO website at www.ato.gov.au/individuals/dealing-with-disasters. Those affected by the 2019–2020 bushfires with a postcode not currently in the identified list can contact the ATO Emergency Support Infoline for tailored help; phone: 1800 806 218.

The ATO will recognise the ongoing effects of this disaster, such as cash flow problems for business owners who have suffered reduced trade. This includes businesses that are not located in the identified regions. The ATO also recognises that there may be situations where additional support or extensions may be required on a case-by-case basis beyond the automatic deferrals announced.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Media-centre/Media-releases/ATO-extends-tax-relief-and-assistance-for-people-impacted-by-bushfires/.

Better protection for consumers: new ASIC powers

In response to the recommendations of the Banking and Financial Services Royal Commission and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Enforcement Review Taskforce Report, the government has proposed new enforcement and supervision powers for ASIC to restore consumer confidence in the financial system, particularly in relation to financial advice. These new powers include enhanced licensing, banning, warrant and phone tap powers, all designed to ensure that avoidable financial disasters uncovered during the Royal Commission are never repeated.

While the Banking and Financial Services Royal Commission seems long ago in the minds of many, the people who have been financially affected will no doubt carry the scar of mistrust for life. This is why the government has introduced new laws which will give ASIC new enforcement and supervision powers in relation to the financial services sector to weed out the “bad apples” and restore consumer confidence.

The new measures seek to strengthen ASIC’s licencing powers by replacing the current Australian financial services (AFS) licence requirement that a person be of “good fame and character” with a new ongoing requirement that they be a “fit and proper person” at both the time of application and subsequently. This applies to all officers, partners, trustees and controllers of the applicant applying for the AFS licence. The “fit and proper person” requirement will also apply to existing AFS licensees to ensure that ASIC can monitor the controllers of existing AFS licensees, request relevant information and carry out enforcement action as required.

In working out whether someone is a “fit and proper person”, ASIC will consider matters including whether the person has been convicted of an offence in the last 10 years, whether they’ve had an AFS licence or Australian credit licence suspended or cancelled, and whether a banning or disqualification order has previously been made.

ASIC’s banning powers will also be expanded to situations where they have reason to believe that a person is “not a fit and proper person” or is “not adequately trained or is not competent” to:

  • provide financial services;
  • perform functions as an officer of an entity that carries on a financial services business; or
  • control an entity that carries on a financial services business.

In addition, under these new powers, ASIC may also make a banning order against a person that is insolvent under administration, has, at least twice, been an officer of a corporation that was unable to pay its debts, or has, at least twice, been linked to a refusal or failure to give effect to an Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determination.

To support these enforcement functions, ASIC’s warrant and phone tap powers have been beefed up. It is no longer required to forewarn those under investigation that it may apply for a search warrant. It is also no longer required to specify the exact books or evidential material that can be searched and seized.

Interception agencies (ie police, ASIO, and anti-corruption bodies) will be able to provide ASIC with lawfully intercepted telecommunications information in some instances and ASIC staff will be able to use and record the received information as well as communicate the information to another person in investigations and prosecutions.All of this means there will be a decreased risk of evidence destruction or alteration.

If these measures become law, ASIC’s ability to launch and progress investigations to protect consumers from dodgy practitioners will be greatly enhanced.

Source: https://treasury.gov.au/consultation/c2019-40503.

Expansion of Tax Avoidance Taskforce activity

The ATO has expanded its Tax Avoidance Taskforce activity to include top 500 private groups, high wealth private groups, and medium and emerging private groups. Perhaps the most interesting is the inclusion of medium and emerging private groups, covering around 97% of the total private group population. These consist of Australian resident individuals who, together with their associates, control wealth between $5 million and $50 million, and businesses with an annual turnover of more than $10 million. Business captured will be receive a notification letter of the next steps.

The Tax Avoidance Taskforce was originally conceived in 2016 to ensure that multinational enterprises, large public and private business pay the right amount of tax. The Taskforce’s main role is to investigate what the ATO considers to be aggressive tax avoidance arrangements, including profit shifting, and to work with partner agencies in other jurisdictions to achieve this goal. In the 2019–2020 Federal Budget, the taskforce was provided with $1 billion over four years – this is in addition to the $679 million provided in 2016 – to extend the operation of the taskforce to the 2022–2023 income year and expand the range of entities it investigates.

As a part of the expansion, the ATO now has three “programs” for private groups under the Taskforce’s umbrella: top 500 private groups, high wealth private groups, and medium and emerging private groups. The expansion that will perhaps affect the most taxpayers will be the program covering medium and emerging private groups.

Businesses or groups that are captured under these programs will be sent a notification letter detailing what needs to be done to prepare for ATO engagement. Characteristics that may attract further ATO scrutiny include tax or economic performance not comparable to similar businesses, low transparency of tax affairs, large/one-off or unusual transactions (eg shifting wealth), aggressive tax planning, lifestyle exceeding after-tax income, accessing business assets for tax-free private use, and poor governance/risk management.

Medium and emerging groups

This program includes private groups linked to Australian resident individuals who, together with their associates, control wealth between $5 million and $50 million, and businesses with an annual turnover of more than $10 million that are not public or foreign owned and are not linked to a high wealth private group. The ATO estimates this would cover around 97% of the total private group population.

The ATO will use data matching and analytic models to identify wealthy individuals and link them to associated entities, which will then be grouped and looked at as a whole. The main aim of the program is to understand the businesses and the operating environments to identify trends and specific risks that will be used to mitigate tax risks. For example, once an issue has been identified, the ATO may contact individual companies about its concerns, or it may publish public advice or guidance on the issue if it is an issue that affects a large proportion of businesses.

Aside from the general advice, the ATO has also flagged using early engagement and pre-lodgement agreements with businesses in this category for commercial deals to provide certainty on significant transactions and events. Of course, the ATO will continue to conduct risk-based reviews and audits where it deems appropriate. Initially, the ATO will focus on larger and “higher risk” private groups, those experiencing rapid growth, looking to expand offshore, or where the controlling individuals are transitioning to retirement.

High wealth private groups program

This program includes Australian resident individuals who, together with their associates, control wealth of more than $50 million. The ATO will take a one-on-one tailored engagement approach to mitigate tax risks.

Top 500 private groups

This program focuses on Australia’s largest private groups and involves regular one-on-one engagements to understand the business, drivers and risk position.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Tax-professionals/Newsroom/Your-practice/Expansion-of-the-Tax-Avoidance-Taskforce-for-private-groups/.

No-cost strategies to increase your super

With all the pandemonium of the new year, your super is probably the last thing on your mind. However, this is precisely the right time to think about implementing some strategies to increase your super for the coming year. With some simple, no-cost strategies such as finding your lost super, consolidating your super accounts and making sure you’re in a fund that’s performing well, you will be well on your way to a comfortable retirement.

Now is the perfect time to put some resolutions in place to increase your super for 2020. After all, it is what we’ll be relying on in retirement, and even small improvements now could mean extra luxuries later.

Currently, 5.8 million individuals in Australia (36% of the population) have two or more super accounts. Every year the ATO launches its postcode “lost super” campaign to help raise community awareness of lost super. As a consequence of the 2018 campaign, more than 66,000 people consolidated over 105,000 accounts worth over $860 million. For the 2019 campaign, the ATO has created tables of lost and unclaimed super per state and postcode that anyone can access. If you think you’ve got lost super, you can then log into myGov to claim it and have it consolidated with your active account.

Finding and consolidating your lost super with your active account means you’ll pay fewer management fees and other costs, saving you in the long term. Between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2019, 2.6 million accounts to the value of $15 billion have been consolidated by fund members using ATO online services. The figures indicate that more and more people are taking advantage of this no-cost strategy to grow their super in the long term.

Another easy way to grow your super is to make sure the super fund that you’re putting your money into is performing well. Recently, the regulator of super funds, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), released “heatmaps” that provide like-for-like comparisons of MySuper products across three key areas: investment performance, fees and costs, and sustainability of member outcomes. The heatmap uses a graduating colour scheme to provide clear and simple insights that unlike a sea of numbers on a spreadsheet, will send a clear and strong message to users.

For example, MySuper products delivering outcomes below the relevant benchmarks in relation to investment performance and fees and costs will be depicted from pale yellow to dark red. The sustainability measures provide an indication of a trustee’s ability to provide quality member outcomes and address areas of underperformance. While the ultimate purpose of the heatmap is to have trustees with areas of underperformance take action to address it, they can also be an invaluable resource in choosing the right super fund.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Forms/Searching-for-lost-super; www.apra.gov.au/mysuper-product-heatmap.

SMSF sole purpose test and fractional investments

Previously, it was thought that any benefit provided directly or indirectly to members or related parties of a self managed super fund (an SMSF) from an investment would contravene the sole purpose test. However, a Full Federal Court decision has reframed the sole purpose test which will provide some flexibility to trustees on certain investments. Notwithstanding this decision, investments in SMSFs remain a complex area with many pitfalls.

To be eligible for superannuation fund tax concessions, SMSFs are required to be maintained for the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits to members. This is known as the sole purpose test: s 62 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act). Failing the test could expose trustees to civil and criminal penalties in addition to the SMSF losing concessional tax treatment. Therefore, it is important when making SMSF investments that the investment does not provide a benefit directly or indirectly to members or related parties.

Whether a fund’s investment contravenes the sole purpose test by providing a benefit directly or indirectly to members or related parties depends entirely on the circumstances of each case. Recently, the Full Federal Court decided that an SMSF investment in a fund to acquire a fraction interest in a property to be leased at market rent to the member’s daughter did not breach the sole purpose test (Aussiegolfa Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 122).

The Full Court said s 62 of the SIS Act does not suggest that an SMSF will not be maintained solely for the core and/or ancillary purposes simply because the trustee enters into a transaction with a related party. It noted that the property was to be leased at market rent therefore there was no current day financial benefit to be obtained by either the member or his daughter. The only benefit would be some comfort or convenience, which was considered to be merely incidental.

However, the Full Court said if the lease was not at market rent, then an inference could readily be drawn that the fund was being maintained for a collateral purpose of providing discounted housing to a relative, which would contravene the sole purpose test.

In response to the Court’s decision, the ATO noted that a trustee of an SMSF could potentially breach the sole purpose test by investing in the fund mentioned in the case if the facts and circumstances indicate that the SMSF was maintained for the collateral purpose of providing accommodation to a related party. Which will be determined by considering all the facts and circumstances surrounding the trustees’ behaviour.

Nevertheless, to provide certainty for the investors in this particular fractional property investment, the ATO said it will not take compliance action if the trustee signs a declaration (the sole purpose test declaration) that avoids:

  • entering into an investment based on its potential to provide related-party accommodation;
  • influencing the fractional property investment fund or a relevant property manager to engage a related party as a tenant of the property; and
  • influencing a related party to become a tenant of the property.

In addition, a copy of this declaration must be retained and provided to approved auditors. The ATO must also not find evidence that indicates the trustee has acted inconsistently with the terms of the signed declaration.

Source: www.ato.gov.au/Super/Self-managed-super-funds/Investing/Sole-purpose-test/Fractional-property-investment—ATO-guidance-on-approach/.

$10,000 cash payment limit: the facts

The government-proposed $10,000 economy-wide cash payment limit has understandably elicited some confusion. Chief among the questions is to what extent personal transactions will be included in the limit. To dispel some of the confusion, the government has released information outlining the circumstances in which the limit would not apply in relation to personal or private transactions. While this proposal is not yet law, once enacted it will be a criminal offence for certain entities to make or accept cash payments of $10,000 or more.

Among other categories, payments that will not be subject to the $10,000 limit include those relating to personal or private transactions (excluding transactions involving real property). The exemption only includes payments that satisfy one of the following:

  • payments solely for supplies or acquisitions that are not made in the course of an enterprise;
  • payments that are made or received by an entity in circumstances where that entity reasonably believes that the payment is solely for supplies or acquisitions that are not made in the course of an enterprise;
  • payments that are made as or as part of a gift (not in the course of an enterprise); or
  • payments that are made or received by an entity as a gift (or part of a gift) in circumstances where that entity reasonably believes that the payment is not made or received in the course of an enterprise.

The term “enterprise” in this context has the same broad meaning as in the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act), meaning that an entity will be undertaking an enterprise if, for example, it carries on a business (or in the form of a business), offers real property for rent, is a charity, political party (or candidate) or other recipient of gifts that are deductible for income tax, operates a super fund, or is the Commonwealth, a state or a territory or an entity established for public purposes under an Australian law. In essence, the only circumstance in which an entity will not be carrying on an enterprise is where the entity is acting in a wholly private or personal capacity.

Therefore, cash gifts to family members (as long as they are not donations to regulated entities such as charities) and inheritances are likely to be exempt. In other words, it is unlikely that you will be prosecuted for a criminal offence if you give your family members a lavish cash wedding gift or help your kids with a house deposit that happens to be over $10,000.

However, if you occasionally sell private assets (eg a used car) you may need to be careful and take reasonable steps to ascertain whether the other party is acting in the course of an enterprise. For example, if you sell your car to another individual and you believe the car will be acquired for private use after undertaking reasonable inquiries such as searching the Australian Business Register, then the exemption for personal/private transactions will apply.

On the other hand, if you did not undertake “reasonable inquiries”, and incorrectly believe that the other party is not acting in the course of an enterprise, then it is possible you may be prosecuted for a criminal offence. In general, whether a belief is reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the transaction and the parties. However, a reasonable belief must be a belief about the facts and does not protect those ignorant of the law or the legal implications of the facts. In other words, you cannot claim that you didn’t know about the rules surrounding the cash payment limit.

Source: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/CurrencyCashBill2019/Public_Hearings

 

Client Alert – February 2020

ATO backs down from controversial time limit ruling

In 2018, the ATO issued a controversial draft ruling which took a very strict stance on the four-year time limit for claiming input tax credits and fuel tax credits. The ruling had been used by the ATO to deny input tax credits and fuel tax credits where the Commissioner of Taxation made a decision outside the four-year period on an objection or amendment request, even where the objection or request was made within the period. However, a recent observation by a judge ruling on a related matter has put the ATO’s strict stance in doubt and as a result the ruling (Draft Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2018/D1) has been withdrawn.

Where the Commissioner makes a decision on an objection or requests for amendment in relation to input tax credits and/or fuel tax credits outside the four-year period but the initial objection or amendment request was lodged within the time limit, the taxpayer will no longer be automatically denied the credits in situations where the decision is in the taxpayer’s favour.

As a result, any taxpayer that the draft ruling has affected is encouraged to contact the ATO.

ATO extends bushfire assistance: lodgements deferred

On 20 January 2020 the ATO announced an extension of the tax assistance package for people impacted by the 2019–2020 bushfires in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania.

Commissioner of Taxation Mr Chris Jordan said the 3.5 million businesses, individuals and self-managed super funds (SMSFs) in the impacted local government areas will have until 28 May 2020 to lodge and pay BAS and income tax returns. This additional time is on top of the two-month extension previously granted.

Additionally, the ATO said it will fast-track any refunds that are due to taxpayers in the impacted regions. For example, businesses expecting a refund as a result of GST credits due to large purchases to replace stock are encouraged to lodge their activity statements at the first opportunity. The ATO will also remit any interest and penalties applied to tax debts since the commencement of the bushfires.

Better protection for consumers: new ASIC powers

In response to the recommendations of the Banking and Financial Services Royal Commission and the ASIC Enforcement Review Taskforce Report, the government has proposed new enforcement and supervision powers for ASIC to restore consumer confidence in the financial system, particularly in relation to financial advice. These new powers include enhanced licensing, banning, warrant and phone tap powers, all designed to ensure that avoidable financial disasters uncovered during the Royal Commission are not repeated again.

While the Banking and Financial Services Royal Commission seems long ago in the minds of many, the people who have been financially affected by dubious practitioners will no doubt carry the scar of mistrust for life. This is precisely why the government has introduced new laws which will give ASIC new enforcement and supervision powers in relation to the financial services sector: to weed out the “bad apples” and restore consumer confidence.

Expansion of Tax Avoidance Taskforce activity

The ATO has recently expanded its Tax Avoidance Taskforce activity to include top 500 private groups, high wealth private groups, and medium and emerging private groups.

The Tax Avoidance Taskforce was originally conceived in 2016 to ensure that multinational enterprises, large public and private business pay the right amount of tax. The Taskforce’s main role is to investigate what the ATO considers aggressive tax avoidance arrangements, including profit shifting.

As a part of the expansion, the ATO now has three “programs” for private groups under the Taskforce’s umbrella: top 500 private groups, high wealth private groups, and medium and emerging private groups. The expansion that will perhaps affect the most taxpayers will be the program covering medium and emerging private groups. This program includes private groups linked to Australian resident individuals who, together with their associates, control wealth between $5 million and $50 million, and businesses with an annual turnover of more than $10 million that are not public or foreign owned and are not linked to a high wealth private group. The ATO estimates this will cover around 97% of the total private group population.

No-cost strategies to increase your super

With all the pandemonium of the new year, your super is probably the last thing on your mind. However, this is precisely the right time to think about implementing some strategies to increase your super for the coming year.

Currently, 5.8 million people in Australia have two or more super accounts. Every year the ATO runs a postcode “lost super” campaign to help raise community awareness. As a consequence of the 2018 campaign, more than 66,000 people consolidated over 105,000 accounts worth over $860 million. For the latest campaign, the ATO has created tables of lost and unclaimed super per state and postcode that anyone can access.

Finding and consolidating your lost super with your active account means you’ll pay fewer management fees and other costs, saving you in the long term.

Another easy way to grow your super is to make sure the super fund that you’re putting your money into is performing well. Recently, the regulator of super funds, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), released “heatmaps” that provide like-for-like comparisons of MySuper products across three key areas: investment performance, fees and costs, and sustainability of member outcomes. While the ultimate purpose of the heatmap is to have trustees with areas of underperformance take action to address it, they can also be an invaluable resource in choosing the right super fund.

SMSF sole purpose test and fractional investments

To be eligible for superannuation fund tax concessions, self-managed super funds (SMSFs) must be maintained for the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits to members. This is known as the sole purpose test. Failing the test could expose trustees to civil and criminal penalties in addition to the SMSF losing concessional tax treatment.

Previously, it was thought that any benefit provided directly or indirectly to members or related parties of an SMSF from an investment would contravene the sole purpose test. However, a recent Full Federal Court decision will provide some flexibility to trustees on certain investments. The Court decided that an SMSF investment in a fund to acquire a fraction interest in a property to be leased at market rent to the member’s daughter did not breach the sole purpose test.

While the Full Court found the SMSF had not breached the sole purpose test, it ultimately ruled against the trustee, finding that the investment was an in-house asset and breached the 5% limit. Crucially, the ATO warned it may still apply compliance resources to scrutinise whether an SMSF investment in fractional property investments contravenes other legal requirements.

$10,000 cash payment limit: the facts

The proposed $10,000 economy-wide cash payment limit has understandably elicited some confusion. While the proposal is not yet law, once enacted it will be a criminal offence for certain entities to make or accept cash payments of $10,000 or more. This is intended to combat the use of cash in black economy activities.

Chief among the questions is to what extent personal transactions will be included in the limit. The government has now released information outlining the circumstances in which the limit would not apply in relation to personal or private transactions.

Among other categories, payments relating to personal or private transactions (excluding transactions involving real property) would not be subject to the limit. Cash gifts to family members (as long as they are not donations to regulated entities such as charities) and inheritances are likely to be exempt. In other words, it is unlikely you will be prosecuted if you give your family members a lavish cash wedding gift or help your kids with a house deposit that happens to be over $10,000.

However, if you occasionally sell private assets (e.g. a used car) you may need to be careful and take reasonable steps to ascertain whether the other party is acting in the course of an enterprise.